From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-54139-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GfKUO-0007jQ-Ta
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:07:01 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA1I2tkH024327;
Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:02:55 GMT
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA1HvUwV023519
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:57:30 GMT
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 9so2625585nzo
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:57:30 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=K9Z/sV/9207ye3UYTcD4Z2LmT/OVe0cTSevbtfmUkj/P8Gai0GJoPOj8trXL3OQUFRfFguPWJC/usVDwGiwIwSD7iBa8K2qakYE2NzqOlIoV7UOFWu5E/ya/zOXKIafqzmLIYcWtqH8Hlf2ztP8UPgUwkyaPN+rjV19wj5iXWdQ=
Received: by 10.64.193.8 with SMTP id q8mr9406490qbf;
Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.218.13 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <642958cc0611010957p5f662326je9088e2c25050d49@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 12:57:27 -0500
From: "Mark Shields" <laebshade@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] X USE flag
In-Reply-To: <20061031083031.0cdf1499@krikkit.digimed.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_25032_32046612.1162403847638"
References: <200610301201.10141.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
<454648E3.6010402@rootsr.com> <200610302041.33785.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
<200610310913.17997.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
<20061031083031.0cdf1499@krikkit.digimed.co.uk>
X-Archives-Salt: 8e1238f4-4e91-4aaf-8123-633d857a7968
X-Archives-Hash: 3f653ee042581eef8975e21dd31967da
------=_Part_25032_32046612.1162403847638
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/31/06, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:13:17 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > I let the emerge run anyway last night, took about 2 hours for 143
> > packages, lots of them just fonts which install quickly. So now I guess
> > It'll have to be done again in a day or three.
>
> If you add X to /var/db/pkg/category/package-version/IUSE for each of
> the affected packages, portage won't try to emerge them again.
>
> It's a kludge, but it works if portage was only going to build the same
> files again.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Help! I've fallen and I can't get down! - James Brown
>
>
>
A re-emerge today brought back those same packages with the X flag profile
masked. Hmm...
--
- Mark Shields
------=_Part_25032_32046612.1162403847638
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/31/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Neil Bothwick</b> <<a href="mailto:neil@digimed.co.uk">neil@digimed.co.uk</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:13:17 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:<br><br>> I let the emerge run anyway last night, took about 2 hours for 143<br>> packages, lots of them just fonts which install quickly. So now I guess<br>> It'll have to be done again in a day or three.
<br><br>If you add X to /var/db/pkg/category/package-version/IUSE for each of<br>the affected packages, portage won't try to emerge them again.<br><br>It's a kludge, but it works if portage was only going to build the same
<br>files again.<br><br><br>--<br>Neil Bothwick<br><br>Help! I've fallen and I can't get down! - James Brown<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>A re-emerge today brought back those same packages with the X flag profile masked. Hmm...
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>- Mark Shields
------=_Part_25032_32046612.1162403847638--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list