Ah well, I stand corrected. I at least had never heard or seen a UDMA44
standard in a BIOS setting or otherwise. This hard drive, btw, sustained
physical damage (dropped while on). Long story on that one.

On 9/30/05, Christoph Gysin <cgysin@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
> Mark Shields wrote:
> > reports the speed as UDMA44 to the BIOS, when in fact there is no such
> > standard and it should be UDMA66, but that's easily fixed with hdparm).
>
> Actually, there was a UDMA44 standard. It's defined in ATA-5 (Ansi NCITS
> 340-2000), tough I've never
> heard of hardware supporting only UDMA44...
>
> Christoph
> --
> echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


--
- Mark Shields