From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: kernel panic -- finding proper config diff
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:41:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63AD5AF6-71CC-407B-888C-458352BA708B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910222050.19932.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
On 22 Oct 2009, at 19:50, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2009 20:17:46 Maxim Wexler wrote:
>>> Why not copy over the .29 config and run make oldconfig?
>>
>> I thought of that, but isn't there too much difference in the
>> versions? I read somewhere that taking to big a leap between versions
>> is unsafe. Not to mention the great whack of new options. If you do a
>> diff -y between the two configs there are lots of gaps.
>
>
> That's version jumps like 2.4 to 2.6
>
> The 2.6 development model is small incremental steps, so the odds
> are always
> in your favour that it will work just fine. Occasionally you might
> find two
> versions that don't like to play nicely with oldconfig but that
> isn't the
> norm.
>
> FWIW, I haven't encountered a single problem with the entire 2.6
> range.
There was a change between 2.6.x and 2.6.x+1 where the whole .config
was rearranged and `make oldconfig` no longer worked. It was a while
ago, so maybe you don't recall it. I think x was circa 22 or so. It
was discussed on here at the time, IIRC, and caused filesystems such
as ext2 (at least) to be unselected if you just ran `make oldconfig`.
Stroller.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-24 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-21 18:25 [gentoo-user] kernel panic -- finding proper config diff Maxim Wexler
2009-10-21 18:56 ` [gentoo-user] " Maxim Wexler
2009-10-21 19:07 ` Jonathan Callen
2009-10-21 19:13 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-21 20:22 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-21 20:35 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-10-21 20:45 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 1:19 ` walt
2009-10-22 3:28 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 3:37 ` William Kenworthy
2009-10-22 3:45 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 14:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-22 18:17 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 18:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-22 18:36 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 18:53 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-22 20:43 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 19:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-22 18:50 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-24 10:41 ` Stroller [this message]
2009-10-22 1:48 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-22 23:31 ` walt
2009-10-23 0:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-23 16:02 ` walt
2009-10-23 21:57 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-23 22:54 ` walt
2009-10-24 1:33 ` Richard Marza
2009-10-24 4:05 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-24 7:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-24 7:44 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-26 4:52 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-26 9:10 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-10-29 4:38 ` waltdnes
2009-10-29 5:45 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-29 5:42 ` Maxim Wexler
2009-10-23 0:56 ` Jonathan Callen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63AD5AF6-71CC-407B-888C-458352BA708B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox