From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-174603-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FE1E139085
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1435E0DED;
	Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B191E0DBB
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g23so14870857wme.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:28:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
         :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6LQiQ3PMYzRM0W+U4FGBh5qJmFz81n8EfqU2WmvsdDQ=;
        b=KCO69mQV+q6x9TtIwW/d2NfUOMzYnw+50lfMwl2M3U/qd607jhP61zNpXEfJ9bWG4L
         OTIG4381H/U+5VVwfoFCu9KQ/DvA/2HQ0b+ivRiWS513dcg4tdrTPAQKOjdrrjQMeuMc
         tJ/MQoN6vphc9uGQVQGgB9rSxt+e4T8sjqXZdwZNmyu4B5lWTSE5CH/Qvtbn3/Vn36Ea
         UeN0uGA0EIK/EqbCVtOPVqe8WEp/7YJLK5TSWoXsfhwwAWRjgLWgGPBHuxifbg7gBa+W
         jEKOYHtw3mEMVXHK1efqwQ/l2y1YAUDygikEYbLuhB0ENAOBGCt7AJyXnWx58r3fI0Nl
         81Ew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
         :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=6LQiQ3PMYzRM0W+U4FGBh5qJmFz81n8EfqU2WmvsdDQ=;
        b=pUY4fvpGXJdWIIFVLzYEaihPBqwe6omgwvxLCTztFElyNoApoAUj6w1kT+b01tz2+q
         gyJnkDSCHOeFxNsi9kiYkSDY+pXiewEINKhMSshPpyPTae2rHkjut0Nczx27oBM8+tu9
         CdMPlg6K/AKPS+vMB/NyYvJZo0U0MlI1So/bkS0y6pNXywtaqiBO7N7KTmXvyAgp5rqu
         WD8EKd8Jqhgp4GUlgYS9zVgS4krZUVFkAMMM+FltkbyFWmOPXJ7vjiSI6bFon4Vcacdv
         ruYYrdYuXloYLp5SaRGcEkC/IxSDG7H2bOlQmUR+Rp7aBGCGqA6e1btp0X9lxG++uo6h
         3nDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIAq7KkG6/9nj+/G1r26+7roEmfmQjc1V8aVKSru4OGpT72cldc2HlNpTtCiC78ag==
X-Received: by 10.28.175.195 with SMTP id y186mr11391248wme.68.1482085716756;
        Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([196.212.62.210])
        by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l6sm13650056wmd.5.2016.12.18.10.28.35
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] from Firefox52: NO pure ALSA?, WAS: Firefox 49.0 &
 Youtube... Audio: No
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20161015182743.GB4541@solfire>
 <20161216101951.GA29887@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_k+toE5DiWMPZrbnFqnJwVuQQ73B-rAmYeGTeyE-WKzBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161216131315.GA4052@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_=LvKf+pbq1Pfs_RfNUB76yFHz3Dv-FK0ZdFAMt_mAbYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161216165118.GA26704@g0n.xdwgrp>
 <CAGfcS_=UDb35V==i5Ma3K6pNBBSyU0Ecp7_u97ZOYSfj-AwnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161217055520.GA13608@waltdnes.org> <20161217085341.311b4c0f@digimed.co.uk>
 <5a387b87-b1cd-f061-3008-3c774973b483@gentoo.org>
 <CAOdo=Sz97AoUXk-NUsJ-z-LjkOTKdj_P6FC1GMX9Euktpj8U+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1db1de34-2bb4-9597-61fd-030a2e7f5209@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=T69_eMQdAVJ==uVUT5d+Gd0+5aqx1ER2Btrrf=4bhaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87zijt5glw.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <633971a7-81d4-a3a4-5a85-714218780f8f@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:26:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87zijt5glw.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c16effe1-a35f-47b6-996b-ec890f64ee89
X-Archives-Hash: b9b64a034c752b38d7b2088e2976a394

On 18/12/2016 18:47, lee wrote:
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> writes:
> 
>> The universe of Linux systems that are running Firefox but not
>> Pulseaudio is fairly small at this point.
> 
> Pulseaudio eats away about 10% CPU without any benefit whatsoever, not
> to mention that it makes things more complex and less reliable.  Why
> would anyone use it?
> 
> Developers might try to make their lifes easier by developing software
> to the point where nobody wants to use it, except for the few developers
> perhaps.  With firefox, a policy like that contradicts their claims.
> 
> 
> This is another issue which comes up quite often with FOSS.  Developers
> claim to be doing something in the interest of their users and are
> asking for support.  When you take a closer look, you find that they
> don't, and when you offer support, they do not want it.
> 
> Why can't they just say that they are making software for themselves the
> way they want it and don't care about what anyone else says or wants?
> It only gives reason to distrust someone when you find that they do not
> do what they claim to be doing.
> 

I think you are over-simplifying the situation here. Step back and look
at the problem from the angle of "it's a bunch of people doing stuff"
and not from a tech-centric angle. It's a people problem.

You could make a valid case that the Mozilla devs are outright lying -
they said they want xvy, and your offer to help provide xyz was
rejected. But is it really that simple? I think it's more a case of the
devs would like contributions for xyz and they don't mention the
"everyone knows" "hidden assumption" of environment abc and general
method def. Ahhhh, that's the usual tripping point.

I don't know the specifics of your particular case, but my first
approximation guess is that there's an abc and def in there which the
devs didn't think to mention. Happens all the time, usually with
stunningly obvious stuff that "everyone" thought "everyone else" knew
about. Things like future roadmaps, planned features, and the individual
personal preferences of each dev.

I guess I'll saying don't be too quick to shoot from the hip - more
looking less assuming is often the better path.


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com