From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R3aaP-0003XB-Tp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:32:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F0EF21C184; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E734E21C0CD for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2011 21:30:27 -0000 Received: from p5B083890.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pc.localnet) [91.8.56.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2011 23:30:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #13997268 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+efIM4LnSeDH7LBtotO6Rxfk2+pp0fTmiYHgdUr6 0SK4Gh/9NaLT1j From: Michael Schreckenbauer To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev + /usr Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:30:31 +0200 Message-ID: <6303992.VQnu7H8W71@pc> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.1 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo; KDE/4.7.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20110912150248.GB3599@acm.acm> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ec8c27611e2313d471e920f8797e6b1c On Tuesday, 13. September 2011 17:10:40 Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Michael Mol wrot= e: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Canek Pel=E1ez Vald=E9s =20 wrote: > >> Want to change the direction of the distro? You know what needs to= be > >> done.>=20 > > Be more specific. It sounds like there are a lot of people in here = who > > want to change the direction of the distro. >=20 > Sorry: I said it a lot of times before in the other thread, so I > thought it was clear. >=20 > > Is it simply subscribing to -dev and voicing the conversation there= ? >=20 > Of course not. But please, do that if you think it will help to steer= > Gentoo to whatever direction do you think is the correct one. > Personaly I don't think the devs (who, AFAIK, do not receive a single= > dime for working on Gentoo) will appreciate anybody telling them how > they should do their jobs, the one they do for free. But that's just > me. As you well know, not all of "our" devs are in favour of this idea. To quote one of them (vapier) "brain dead behavior in other packages has no bearing on openrc. openr= c will=20 never require crap like initramfs simply to boot. -mike" And in a later mail: "...if there is something in openrc that doesnt=20 work with a split /usr or /var, then file a bug because it is a bug..."= > No, by "you know what needs to be done" I mean: code. Contribute. > Become a developer. Make shit happens the way you think it should > happen. > Shut up and code. Google it, I didn't come with the phrase. There are already devs on "our" side. Fortunatly one of them maintains = openrc=20 :) > Regards. Regards, Michael