From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JjECL-0006l3-Nc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:49:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E0EEE01A3; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85E8E0185 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FD265A8C for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:48:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.476 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.476 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nB601uGKPb3J for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62427662FF for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JjEBj-0006yp-V2 for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:48:39 +0000 Received: from zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch ([212.55.215.153]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:48:39 +0000 Received: from michael.schmarck by zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:48:39 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Schmarck Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "emerge -DuvatN world" doesn't show all upgradeable packages Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:48:25 +0200 Organization: =?UTF-8?B?xYI=?= Message-ID: <6138102.ZC26vypvYO@schmarck.cn> References: <2577300.OLZLf1hHOn@schmarck.cn> <20080408114436.4b5285b2@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <1971498.rAt26meG94@schmarck.cn> <200804081312.52849.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <5573059.kmkQssb8iy@schmarck.cn> <20080408132916.6f5448a8@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <1326240.XvfEZOQFu1@schmarck.cn> <20080408141616.334ee6f7@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> <1377066.Li1qCSo38g@schmarck.cn> <20080408144404.7d1c131b@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: zy-rieter.cyberlink.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 2499c72a-a3d1-4f2a-8b0c-b2a137c5d06e X-Archives-Hash: 3080a285e0d06d273799bb41a83cc452 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:27:59 +0200, Michael Schmarck wrote: > >> It really depends on, from what side you're coming. If you want >> just a few packages, then all is well with the current approach. >> >> If you, however, want everything but a few packages, then the >> current approach isn't so fine anymore. > > Do as previously suggested and use individual meta packages instead of > the all-encompassing kde-meta, I think, I'm doing that. And in doing that, I came to the point, that nothing depends on kde-i18n. I did a find /usr/portage -name "*ebuild" -exec grep kde-i18n {} + and found, that only the kde-meta package depends on kde-i18n. Michael -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list