From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LcfYL-0001hk-I2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:41:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95EECE0238; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.150]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8AE0238 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so119874eye.10 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:41:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oNu0TstVX/3/2nV0hmFrrij+2zK8miCmmjAJ3yF67Cg=; b=ZtxGfPd8stZQVrZEJXQ4ZANdonxr1ke094Val59dXRgdXvj1L/04M84SKl68/h2lbq ZmZPqntNv1fGWHPEp0iYfHb+GM4ZWfvMZon1Pk/T8oGABpXCg4pBUPBMo0QP45tcbX01 gAh4sutJl46LsSiKWTi/VyXoEgEzjLH4D2OQc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=w2YAIEQSj0PvdHhz4bW29B8Xh4Iwf22p/i7O8wjlZhzCONWy+iAjwaQlMGKi25Yw6p 15EvVq0wP+ovSTDySv1DJD9Tw3kZ3F6C4uSouo/9sYg/qXX/dHhDxwnVsTrZkg4mgi8j 8YmfDk2vvgB+88N1aZwoj4SCRPeCpdXPuI6j4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.42.20 with SMTP id p20mr997077ebp.66.1235652082570; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:41:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090225220253.71a4dc65@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> References: <60a795cd0902250829y59c3b087g47518834f1bb7ffd@mail.gmail.com> <200902251736.04630.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <49A582F5.203@yahoo.com.br> <20090225200336.18c0bb83@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20090225201138.GA7096@revolver> <20090225220253.71a4dc65@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:41:22 -0200 Message-ID: <60a795cd0902260441t6282f0c0wbd81cae044d5febd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] update to portage 2.2 From: Alejandro To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174be0307294970463d1abb2 X-Archives-Salt: 67842560-5fe0-4ce2-afab-6c1cf4bb287a X-Archives-Hash: bdf1ba820e94f34950bc63bbf0508a4d --0015174be0307294970463d1abb2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2009/2/25 Neil Bothwick > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote: > > > > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted. > > > Doesn't look really stable: > > > > # Zac Medico (05 Jan 2009) > > # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the > > # package sets and preserve-libs features. > > >=sys-apps/portage-2.2_pre > > That depends on the severity of the known bugs, and the likelihood of > meeting them. The only real bug I've had is that I had to emerge > @preserved-rebuild several times, after one update, before it would go > away. A waste of CPU cycles but hardly a stability threat. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses > I just upgraded to the latatest portage version rc23 or similar. Added the set file linked in the KDE 4.x guide in /etc/portage/sets/kde. also unmasked all the packes also linked in the same guide I see a set called kde, but still i can't install kde because i get blocks and non-existant sets... so better i will wait to instll kde and also use the new version of portage. --0015174be0307294970463d1abb2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2009/2/25 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.= co.uk>
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:11:38 +0100, Momesso Andrea wrote:

> > No, but they are stable, and required for sets as the OP wanted.<= br>
> Doesn't look really stable:
>
> # Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> (05 Jan 2009)
> # Portage 2.2 is masked due to known bugs in the
> # package sets and preserve-libs features.
> >=3Dsys-apps/portage-2.2_pre

That depends on the severity of the known bugs, and the likelihood of=
meeting them. The only real bug I've had is that I had to emerge
@preserved-rebuild several times, after one update, before it would go
away. A waste of CPU cycles but hardly a stability threat.


--
Neil Bothwick

Top Oxymorons Number 12: Plastic glasses

=A0I just upgraded to the latatest portage ve= rsion rc23 or similar. Added the set file linked in the KDE 4.x guide in /e= tc/portage/sets/kde. also unmasked all the packes also linked in the same g= uide I see a set called kde, but still i can't install kde because i ge= t blocks and non-existant sets... so better i will wait to instll kde and a= lso use the new version of portage.
--0015174be0307294970463d1abb2--