From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PCIe x1 or PCIe x4 SATA controller card
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:18:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d324904-4d4d-a02c-4a8a-cd985b170df6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCDTiRYMr4lIYYUs@kern>
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:08:29PM -0500 schrieb Dale:
>> Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>>> <<<SNIP>>>
>>> With each generation, the architecture becomes more efficient, meaning more
>>> instructions per cycle, lower consumption and so on. The max frequency is
>>> not really the driving force behind performance increase anymore due to
>>> efficiency issues at higher frequencies.
>>>
>>> Here are some benchmark comparisons from cpubenchmark.net:
>>>
>>> Processor year power cores single-core score multi-core score
>>> FX-8350 2012 125 W 8/8 1580 6026
>>> i5-4590 2014 84 W 4/4 2086 5356
>>> i5-10400 2020 65 W 6/12 2580 12258
>>> R3 4300G 2020 65 W 4/8 2557 11017
>>> R5 5600G 2021 65 W 6/12 3185 19892
>>> R5 7600X 2022 145 W 6/12 4213 28753
>>>
>>> Sources:
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html#desktop-thread
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core&id=1780
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-4590+%40+3.30GHz&id=2234
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-10400+%40+2.90GHz&id=3737
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+3+4300G&id=3808
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+5600G&id=4325
>>> https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+7600X&id=5033
>>> […]
>> It's been a while. I been getting some things ready for garden time and
>> a few spring projects as well. I looked at a few lists of CPU
>> processors. This is a bit pricey but I may try to buy a AMD Ryzen 9
>> 5900X 12-Core @ 3.7 GHz. It has 4 more cores but clock speed is a
>> little slower. Even just comparing number of cores and the fairly close
>> clock speed, that alone should make it a bit faster. Add in that they
>> make them run code more efficiently now, should be a good bit better. I
>> usually try to aim for 4 or 5 times more processing power. I suspect
>> this may help with encryption as well since newer CPUs have extra code
>> just for that on there now. Most of the mobos also handle a lot more
>> memory as well. I have 32GBs now. Most support 64GB and I think I saw
>> a 128GB version somewhere.
>>
>> Just comparing CPU to CPU, what would you expect as far as increase in
>> speed? I'm not expecting a exact number, just curious as to how much
>> difference I could reasonably expect.
> Since I personally don’t have any experience with high-performance
> contemporary CPUs and can’t remember all those reviews I read in my newsfeed
> from time to time, I tend to visit benchmark sites like the aforementioned
> cpubenchmark.net. Those provide comparable numbers of synthetic and/or
> real-world benchmarks for both single- and multi-core use cases.
>
> The Phoronix Test Suite is another notable name, and also very
> linux-centric. I haven’t used that one myself yet, but have a look and click
> around:
> https://openbenchmarking.org/suites/pts
>
> It’s open source, so you can run it on your own machine to get comparison
> numbers.
>
I used to use the bogomips number as a rough guide. Thing is, the new
CPU has a lower bogomips number than my current CPU does. That doesn't
seem right. So, I guess that number no longer means much. So, I went
digging on the site you linked to. I found this but not sure what to
make of it.
https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Processor/AMD+Ryzen+9+5900X+12-Core,AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core
Some tests, my CPU is faster. Most, the new one is faster. Some by
quite a bit. It seems most things would improve but others may not. Am
I reading that correctly? I'm trying to figure if I'd be better in the
long run to buy that expensive CPU or pick one of the cheaper ones you
mentioned. I started off with a 4 core on current rig and went to 8
core and slightly higher frequency. Money wise it was pretty painless.
I could do that again with new rig.
Once I pick a CPU, the rest will come easier. Mobos have to have the
right socket, then it has only certain memory sticks that will fit etc
etc etc.
Thanks for any light you can shed on this. Googling just leads to a ton
of confusion. What's true 6 months ago is wrong today. :/ It's hard
to tell what still applies.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-13 12:24 [gentoo-user] PCIe x1 or PCIe x4 SATA controller card Dale
2023-03-13 12:48 ` Rich Freeman
2023-03-13 14:34 ` Dale
2023-03-13 15:10 ` Mark Knecht
2023-03-15 12:45 ` Dale
2023-03-15 22:03 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-15 22:15 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-15 22:36 ` [gentoo-user]Computer build, was " Dale
2023-03-16 10:01 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-16 11:41 ` Rich Freeman
2023-03-26 19:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2023-03-26 21:21 ` Peter Humphrey
2023-03-26 23:21 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-27 0:18 ` Dale [this message]
2023-03-27 9:30 ` Wols Lists
2023-03-27 11:33 ` Rich Freeman
2023-03-27 10:37 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-27 11:24 ` Rich Freeman
2023-03-27 12:54 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2023-03-27 13:31 ` Wol
2023-03-27 13:45 ` Peter Humphrey
2023-09-19 13:40 ` Peter Humphrey
2023-09-20 0:51 ` Peter Humphrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d324904-4d4d-a02c-4a8a-cd985b170df6@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox