From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073E2138330 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB4A7E0C10; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92828E0BCF for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.150] (cpc91222-cmbg18-2-0-cust442.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.106.31.187]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DA220E72C3 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GTK+ circular dependency To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20161013033643.06f0d880@hal9000.localdomain> <20161013181442.4d42052f@digimed.co.uk> From: Daniel Quinn Message-ID: <5d194998-35d3-10cc-af58-d4efdb408a7b@danielquinn.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:17:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161013181442.4d42052f@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 95cf63de-2a7a-4394-88c0-e9d804b1efb5 X-Archives-Hash: b8e20d1b8231ebcd22f5a61b09b196b3 > Because the ebuild says so. The question you should be asking is "why", > especially as none of the other gtk+ ebuilds contain this DEPEND. And > that's a question that is probably best asked on b.g.o. Sorry, but what's "b.g.o."? Are you saying that this might be a bug?