* [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
@ 2023-11-24 1:55 Matt Connell
2023-11-24 2:00 ` Matt Connell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Connell @ 2023-11-24 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
First time I've seen this happen!
Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
following preserved libs:
---
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
* - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
* - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
* - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1
* - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2
* used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved)
>>> package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3
* - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3
* - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2
* - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
* - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0
* - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1
* - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16
* - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1
* - /usr/lib/libz.so.1
* - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved)
---
But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
"Nothing to merge; quitting."
Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-24 1:55 [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild Matt Connell
@ 2023-11-24 2:00 ` Matt Connell
2023-11-24 10:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Connell @ 2023-11-24 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Sorry for the double post; I got a mail-undeliverable from Google so I
thought it didn't go through and retried it. Turns out it got to the
mailing list (both times) but not to gmail recipients because Google
doesn't like my SPF record (record says hard-fail on no match and
someone somewhere is using ipv6).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-24 2:00 ` Matt Connell
@ 2023-11-24 10:39 ` Nuno Silva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nuno Silva @ 2023-11-24 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 2023-11-24, Matt Connell wrote:
> Sorry for the double post; I got a mail-undeliverable from Google so I
> thought it didn't go through and retried it. Turns out it got to the
> mailing list (both times) but not to gmail recipients because Google
> doesn't like my SPF record (record says hard-fail on no match and
> someone somewhere is using ipv6).
No, it's definitely not a problem at your side, this is still caused by
the same user which is still subscribed using a @live.ru mailbox and
then sets it to forward to their Gmail address.
Last time I checked, Microsoft, when forwarding, pretends to be the
original sender, instead of @live.ru, which triggers the failure you see
from Gmail.
In the details in the error/failure message the only thing that refers
to you will likely be your address. The IP address which tried to
send the message to Google belongs to Microsoft.
--
Nuno Silva
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
@ 2023-11-23 21:51 Matt Connell
2023-11-24 3:06 ` Jack
2023-11-24 22:12 ` Bryan Gardiner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matt Connell @ 2023-11-23 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
First time I've seen this happen!
Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
following preserved libs:
---
!!! existing preserved libs:
>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
* - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
* - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
* - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1
* - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2
* used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved)
>>> package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3
* - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3
* - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2
* - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
* - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0
* - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0
* - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1
* - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16
* - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>> package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1
* - /usr/lib/libz.so.1
* - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved)
* used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved)
---
But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
"Nothing to merge; quitting."
Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-23 21:51 [gentoo-user] " Matt Connell
@ 2023-11-24 3:06 ` Jack
2023-11-24 6:37 ` Arve Barsnes
2023-11-24 22:12 ` Bryan Gardiner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jack @ 2023-11-24 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild?
On 11/23/23 16:51, Matt Connell wrote:
> First time I've seen this happen!
>
> Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
> following preserved libs:
>
> ---
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
>>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>>> package: dev-libs/libpcre2-10.42-r1
> * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libpcre2-8.so.0.11.2
> * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4 (preserved)
>>>> package: media-gfx/graphite2-1.3.14_p20210810-r3
> * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3
> * - /usr/lib/libgraphite2.so.3.2.1
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>>> package: media-libs/freetype-2.13.2
> * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6
> * - /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>>> package: media-libs/harfbuzz-8.2.0
> * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>>> package: media-libs/libpng-1.6.40-r1
> * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16
> * - /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>>> package: sys-libs/zlib-1.3-r1
> * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1
> * - /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.13
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libpng16.so.16.40.0 (preserved)
>
> ---
>
> But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
> "Nothing to merge; quitting."
>
> Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-24 3:06 ` Jack
@ 2023-11-24 6:37 ` Arve Barsnes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Arve Barsnes @ 2023-11-24 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 04:07, Jack <ostroffjh@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> May or may not help, but have you tried revdep-rebuild?
Also, you can try just one-shotting the reported packages, such as
(for the last one in your list):
emerge -1 sys-libs/zlib
Regards,
Arve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-23 21:51 [gentoo-user] " Matt Connell
2023-11-24 3:06 ` Jack
@ 2023-11-24 22:12 ` Bryan Gardiner
2023-11-25 1:35 ` Dale
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Gardiner @ 2023-11-24 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:51:37 -0500
Matt Connell <matt@connell.tech> wrote:
> First time I've seen this happen!
>
> Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
> following preserved libs:
>
> ---
>
> !!! existing preserved libs:
> >>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
> >>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
> <snip>
>
> But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
> "Nothing to merge; quitting."
>
> Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
Assuming you're on amd64... These are 32-bit libraries. You probably
had abi_x86_32 set on these packages before, and it's not any more.
Normally Portage will remove these if no other (32-bit) package
requires them, but nowadays there is the
freetype[harfbuzz] -> harfbuzz -> freetype
dependency cycle, so you need to explicitly break the cycle *while
temporarily reenabling 32-bit* to get Portage to remove the libs
cleanly. Something like, temporarily put this in package.use:
app-arch/bzip2 abi_x86_32
dev-libs/glib abi_x86_32
dev-libs/libpcre2 abi_x86_32
media-gfx/graphite2 abi_x86_32
media-libs/freetype abi_x86_32 -harfbuzz # Break the cycle.
media-libs/harfbuzz abi_x86_32
media-libs/libpng abi_x86_32
sys-libs/zlib abi_x86_32
and reemerge these packages. Then when you remove these USE flags and
emerge again, the 32-bit libraries will disappear.
Cheers,
Bryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-24 22:12 ` Bryan Gardiner
@ 2023-11-25 1:35 ` Dale
2023-11-25 8:29 ` Dale
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2023-11-25 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Bryan Gardiner wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:51:37 -0500
> Matt Connell <matt@connell.tech> wrote:
>
>> First time I've seen this happen!
>>
>> Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
>> following preserved libs:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>>>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
>> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
>> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
>> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
>> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>>>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
>> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
>> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
>> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
>> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>> <snip>
>>
>> But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
>> "Nothing to merge; quitting."
>>
>> Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
> Assuming you're on amd64... These are 32-bit libraries. You probably
> had abi_x86_32 set on these packages before, and it's not any more.
> Normally Portage will remove these if no other (32-bit) package
> requires them, but nowadays there is the
>
> freetype[harfbuzz] -> harfbuzz -> freetype
>
> dependency cycle, so you need to explicitly break the cycle *while
> temporarily reenabling 32-bit* to get Portage to remove the libs
> cleanly. Something like, temporarily put this in package.use:
>
> app-arch/bzip2 abi_x86_32
> dev-libs/glib abi_x86_32
> dev-libs/libpcre2 abi_x86_32
> media-gfx/graphite2 abi_x86_32
> media-libs/freetype abi_x86_32 -harfbuzz # Break the cycle.
> media-libs/harfbuzz abi_x86_32
> media-libs/libpng abi_x86_32
> sys-libs/zlib abi_x86_32
>
> and reemerge these packages. Then when you remove these USE flags and
> emerge again, the 32-bit libraries will disappear.
>
> Cheers,
> Bryan
>
>
Somewhat related. I had a lot of entries in a package.use file for the
abi 32 version. Those entries were pretty old. They were likely from
back when some packages hadn't changed to 64 yet but have since then. I
made a copy of the entries and removed the file. I then did a emerge
-auDN world and it is changing to 64 version for all of them without
complaint. I mention this for this reason, anyone reading this may want
to check any entries they may have but forgot about and see if they can
be removed on their system as well. This may take care of any future
problems like this or other problems, such as no 32 version available
anymore.
Reading this post is what reminded me that I had those entries. I'd
forgot about it since they are in a separate file from other package.use
entries. I may not be alone in this.
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild
2023-11-25 1:35 ` Dale
@ 2023-11-25 8:29 ` Dale
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2023-11-25 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Dale wrote:
> Bryan Gardiner wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:51:37 -0500
>> Matt Connell <matt@connell.tech> wrote:
>>
>>> First time I've seen this happen!
>>>
>>> Any time I emerge anything, I get portage telling me I have the
>>> following preserved libs:
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> !!! existing preserved libs:
>>>>>> package: app-arch/bzip2-1.0.8-r4
>>> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1
>>> * - /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0.8
>>> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (preserved)
>>> * used by /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.20.1 (preserved)
>>>>>> package: dev-libs/glib-2.76.4
>>> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
>>> * - /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.7600.4
>>> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0 (preserved)
>>> * used by /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0.60801.0 (preserved)
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> But when I run emerge @preserved-rebuild as one should, all I get is:
>>> "Nothing to merge; quitting."
>>>
>>> Anyone else experienced this? How do I figure out what I need to do?
>> Assuming you're on amd64... These are 32-bit libraries. You probably
>> had abi_x86_32 set on these packages before, and it's not any more.
>> Normally Portage will remove these if no other (32-bit) package
>> requires them, but nowadays there is the
>>
>> freetype[harfbuzz] -> harfbuzz -> freetype
>>
>> dependency cycle, so you need to explicitly break the cycle *while
>> temporarily reenabling 32-bit* to get Portage to remove the libs
>> cleanly. Something like, temporarily put this in package.use:
>>
>> app-arch/bzip2 abi_x86_32
>> dev-libs/glib abi_x86_32
>> dev-libs/libpcre2 abi_x86_32
>> media-gfx/graphite2 abi_x86_32
>> media-libs/freetype abi_x86_32 -harfbuzz # Break the cycle.
>> media-libs/harfbuzz abi_x86_32
>> media-libs/libpng abi_x86_32
>> sys-libs/zlib abi_x86_32
>>
>> and reemerge these packages. Then when you remove these USE flags and
>> emerge again, the 32-bit libraries will disappear.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bryan
>>
>>
>
> Somewhat related. I had a lot of entries in a package.use file for the
> abi 32 version. Those entries were pretty old. They were likely from
> back when some packages hadn't changed to 64 yet but have since then. I
> made a copy of the entries and removed the file. I then did a emerge
> -auDN world and it is changing to 64 version for all of them without
> complaint. I mention this for this reason, anyone reading this may want
> to check any entries they may have but forgot about and see if they can
> be removed on their system as well. This may take care of any future
> problems like this or other problems, such as no 32 version available
> anymore.
>
> Reading this post is what reminded me that I had those entries. I'd
> forgot about it since they are in a separate file from other package.use
> entries. I may not be alone in this.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
This ended up doing that circularharfbuzz and freetype thing. I removed
a couple packages that I have that others may not. I ended up doing
this to get around it and it doesn't require any file editing.
USE="-harfbuzz abi_x86_32" emerge -1va app-arch/bzip2 dev-libs/glib
media-libs/freetype dev-libs/libpcre media-gfx/graphite2
media-libs/harfbuzz media-libs/libpng sys-libs/zlib
And then:
emerge -avuDN --with-bdeps=y @world
I post that just in case someone can't get around the problem with the
info from Bryan. I'm not sure why Bryan's didn't work tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-25 8:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-24 1:55 [gentoo-user] Portage reports preserved libs, but won't rebuild Matt Connell
2023-11-24 2:00 ` Matt Connell
2023-11-24 10:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno Silva
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-11-23 21:51 [gentoo-user] " Matt Connell
2023-11-24 3:06 ` Jack
2023-11-24 6:37 ` Arve Barsnes
2023-11-24 22:12 ` Bryan Gardiner
2023-11-25 1:35 ` Dale
2023-11-25 8:29 ` Dale
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox