From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -avt xfce4-meta; haven't got startxfce4. Help, please!
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:37:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b1002100837i6c54c8c7v24d7871573eb25af@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002101742.56152.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 17:33:46 Mark Knecht wrote:
<SNIP>
>>
>> Is it just me? On a new install I always still to an emerge -e @world
>> once I get to a working text based boot and I've done any modification
>> to make.conf as I don't really know how the compiler or tool set was
>> built. Just paranoid.
>
> That's worthwhile, it goes real quick once gcc and glibc are built. Plus
> (until recently at least) the published stages always had an out of date gcc
> on them.
>
>> I used to do it twice before I started installing apps or desktops but
>> I've cut back. :-)
>
> Twice is pointless :-)
>
> gcc rebuilds itself twice to ensure that the binary is built with the same
> version as the result, and verifies that the last two are bit-wise identical.
> Then building the toolchain, then building the rest of world gives you exactly
> what you hope to get from doing it twice.
>
And it was you or Neil or someone else here who pointed that out maybe
1-2 years ago so I stopped doing it twice.
But, heck, why not? I do a lot of pointless things every day. I only
do new installs a few times a year... ;-)
Anyway, right after the system first comes up it's usually less than 1
hour to do a complete rebuild of that most basic system and I've had
very few _strange_ problems bringing up Gentoo since I started doing
it. (In 2000, so 10 years now...)
- Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 18:00 [gentoo-user] emerge -avt xfce4-meta; haven't got startxfce4. Help, please! Alan Mackenzie
2010-02-09 18:36 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 19:23 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-09 20:30 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2010-02-09 23:17 ` dhk
2010-02-09 19:39 ` [gentoo-user] " dhk
2010-02-10 11:22 ` Alan Mackenzie
2010-02-10 15:33 ` Mark Knecht
2010-02-10 15:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2010-02-10 16:37 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2010-02-10 20:32 ` Alan McKinnon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b1002100837i6c54c8c7v24d7871573eb25af@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox