From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPz59-0003v5-Q7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:59:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03332E0784; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26EEE0784 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so390574pwj.26 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:58:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hG7oU9B8X+mESuWQLKmKiEdn3cuMOSQUcAf4igq7LMA=; b=uD0iOwgviadVPOMp9AbOk9YIhzFBgAwk6gHBLGQXyfhXv0upSFphB/GiC2KjhSyEA1 SwjjhIqIqPTyB+1/iz0dwj0WaJnQRD/MLpGsHfqU5ZEacc+GHweFOeedYTIcn/9Z89cJ g7d5aQRcP+QNtpaSMqzQEnas5Jd7gVQBM+8m0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TH8+2A6o9zxFbLKzZbLQbphzLVkpmKdrUEVFlo9f/w7FlqrCrfdi0Cuu8JomkTBa4v NnI0N8/7vLgcFUg21wK/bhU3lQKaqzhJ/YMGLuipA3SztTGrQGHDySXrd+OAxt2cqCAf YvO1yJ4Ob9Wa6Z/b0cI1gYRqdvVaaNGRe8vpk= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.3 with SMTP id i3mr12307388wfa.19.1262181524436; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:58:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200912301244.52527.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> References: <5bdc1c8b0912291753p46880ce8ta8e4d7e29561ab1f@mail.gmail.com> <20091230102712.3b05b5ae@digimed.co.uk> <200912301244.52527.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:58:44 -0800 Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0912300558w853c5c8h5329242cbc638c56@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse??? From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8cbdc241-f993-4508-81ae-c9c9fb88260f X-Archives-Hash: eb353e9d552946dd21c7ddf6fbfb3825 On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon wr= ote: > On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: >> > What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an >> > overlay? >> >> [root@zaphod ~ 0]% eix subclipse >> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1] >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Available versions: =C2=A01.1.9!s 1.2.0!s >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Homepage: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0h= ttp://subclipse.tigris.org/ >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Description: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Subversion = support for Eclipse (binary) >> >> [1] "digital-trauma.de" layman/trauma >> >> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to th= e >> eix database. >> > > I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without instal= ling > the overlay first > > eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines: dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse No matches found. dragonfly ~ # After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it: dragonfly ~ # layman -l * trauma [Subversion] (http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/ ) dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1] Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/ Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary) [1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma dragonfly ~ # but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place? This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly. I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here. And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5. Thanks, Mark