From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-102898-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N53Fc-0002zo-C4
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:11:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8329BE07B4;
	Mon,  2 Nov 2009 20:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f199.google.com (mail-pz0-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ED7E07B4
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Nov 2009 20:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so3497391pzk.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:11:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=wrbY/JP7f81OmarE/oXT/TQ8bQVwtlW1MhxvXkyKtj8=;
        b=h0m8KhsJ9R0ds739p8d1klS6yA1UZOhuZwrDShMeWwrkVeCI3vXK26MEXy1xAqoqGu
         FdL0dmjTfZY5CSevwW+/BQHf8tiKFNY1c5wLj08hVl+x2oFDFhIQjvF1JAueb2cHVg7m
         GbzdudBuDmIpwMge11juS3gb2v0QSbLVQ5CBE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Wap3FNLBxlCEwcMXrVilSSDmmA+ty+ew5k4Kx5Fy1qvENj9hCC9HTo0sy0/MBxh9Wi
         CSzvdN+yaLIMERJT5SO+Rv+R0NXwbfQyW5aIP9sJvZ9/7QlYz8NCQrRRAA5ZqLeKLkeN
         GmcPIc72cHgttjqrwxYmOH6gDjd3SSygAby/M=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.4.10 with SMTP id 10mr909419wfd.124.1257192676859; Mon, 02 
	Nov 2009 12:11:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4AEF315B.9050005@cox.net>
References: <4AEF13DD.9050400@cox.net> <4AEF278C.4090901@kutulu.org>
	 <4AEF315B.9050005@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:11:16 -0800
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0911021211w1dc38c73yefd867ebe37829a1@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 3.5 without changing entire system to 
	~arch?
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 98af19ea-c019-41c9-a3c0-12554a82d276
X-Archives-Hash: dd3b04b65ef3430dd1384f867efaa20a

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Marcus Wanner <marcusw@cox.net> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> Thank you, I added firefox and xulrunner to package.keywords and that did
> the trick.
>
> Marcus
>
>

You might want to periodically run eix-test-obsolete -d to see if the
two packages get marked stable before some other new ~arch version
comes out. If that happens, and it often does in my experience, then
you can remove the two packages from portage.keywords and you're back
to running stable.

In general I tend to have 4 or 5 packages in package.keywords at any
given time. I don't have too much trouble. Watch out if the list
starts getting large though as things get messy and you'll find
yourself doing more updates than maybe you want to be doing.

good luck,
Mark