From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:17:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0906241317y5598f922i83c8c82920c45f3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624084658.53ecec61@zaphod.digimed.co.uk>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Neil Bothwick<neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
<SNIP>
>
>> A different short-term solution might be to find another old junker
>> machine that is supported, building it out of junker parts. This would
>> be good if I had any certainty that when the work was completed
>> portage wouldn't immediately create the same havok.
>
> Your real problem is that you are using outdated and unsupported
> hardware. Not unsupported by Gentoo but unsupported by ATI. Incidentally,
> have you filed a bug report about this, if the only available driver for
> your hardware has been removed from portage, you should post a bug asking
> it to be reinstated.
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> "I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away"
>
Unfortunately for me:
1) It absolutely isn't that the hardware is unsupported, it's that a
*feature* of the hardware (TV Out S-Video) became unsupported. The
machine works (AFAIK) with Gentoo. It boots, it probably runs X just
fine using the VGA output. It's that the S-Video output feature (TV
Out) has become unsupported by ati-driver. Who would have ever guessed
when you purchased a machine that uses and ATI chipset with a built-in
ATI graphics controller that it would be ATI that chose to obsolete
it? Amazing...
2) Following your Bugzilla suggestion about asking that it be put back
into portage to it's logical conclusion and it gets scary. Here's the
paraphrased request:
a) I need ati-driver-8.28.8 put back into portage because it's the
last driver that supports TV out for the 9100 IGP chipset.
b) Unfortunately I need 2.6.19 added back into portage because it's
the last kernel that ati-driver-8.28.8 runs on.
c) Because all this old stuff doesn't work on the new xorg-server I
need xorg-server-1.1.1 to remain in portage.
Multiply this sort of requirement up by whatever additional packages
are required to get the stuff above actually working and it looks
unlikely, 'eh? Granted, I don't need the kernel because I can just get
that and manage it myself. (I.e. - I don't need gentoo-sources)
I really think this is what a personal overlay is for, but as I've
said for years, it's hard to build an overlay when you don't know what
needs to be in it until it's been removed. And yes, *something* has
removed these files, at least from my distfiles directory and I'm
pretty confident it wasn't me by hand because the machines all have
disk space which is the only reason I ever remove packages from there
by hand. There are still things lurking around in /var/db/pkgs or
whatever it's called so maybe I can learn how to create a personal
overlay form what's left and then go look elsewhere for other things
required.
Anyway, thanks for the inputs. I'm not sure what I'm going to do next
other than take some time and figure things out.
As always I appreciate your help.
Cheers,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 23:20 [gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx Mark Knecht
2009-06-23 23:27 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-23 23:40 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-23 23:53 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 0:06 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 0:16 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-24 0:27 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 0:33 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-24 0:42 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 1:32 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-24 3:13 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 5:55 ` Dale
2009-06-24 0:29 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-24 0:37 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 1:46 ` Dale
2009-06-24 1:14 ` Keith Dart
2009-06-24 1:28 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-24 1:42 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 7:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-24 20:17 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2009-06-24 20:29 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-24 20:32 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-25 0:08 ` Adam Carter
2009-06-25 0:46 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-25 0:59 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-25 1:25 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-25 1:04 ` Adam Carter
2009-06-25 1:07 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-25 1:15 ` Adam Carter
2009-06-25 1:27 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-25 1:51 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-25 2:33 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-25 8:47 ` bn
2009-06-25 17:42 ` Mark Knecht
2009-06-24 9:21 ` Peter Humphrey
2009-06-24 14:25 ` Paul Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0906241317y5598f922i83c8c82920c45f3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox