From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LdCDq-0005ac-9Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:34:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68F34E028E; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37830E028E for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so1451613wff.10 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:34:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Tj+3z72x9qHlFiXPFmGWOBZc+ua1PAUSYIcI6qkXHI=; b=QA280RuxJAZ4Cy8tvduP/GqfzXu3CRPrA1NpuZwpF7u2OCqVobzKcB86nssrxk4T6y 2sAzmwdKuk5Q+x3fhDJn72V/BwTw69OaJeLGcVH3yD/lzs85kSzVPBKjzTd0nSr/ZUVh r3ObKDWyChRaZVVx5ikcQK7RrC3BNf8/lMSPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xl+okJaZopcSsIr9ceBRwo0VprNNsF50QdHAXNG/5WH2GbXMJEv24/kgfKkDqjg5PF Gq1UNQlE2vWgl/+ocE7mEokx1hHHTMgKmq2RVTY7Za8Q85OTR5ed5T03G+e5j87jChnr frmPDxvCvf3CX8RT7eVaxtbSsXDXBHK9tETfc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr1537959wfl.54.1235777663772; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:34:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10902271221k30134a9fg907bc477dfc3683@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10902261934l1d33ff17nd64fbfaff4d5b1a3@mail.gmail.com> <49A763C4.5010201@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902262142u68d0a789g336e23849987494d@mail.gmail.com> <49A78BA0.8030602@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902270737s7cd41da0t734fdc00d5c67a73@mail.gmail.com> <49A80CEE.5000200@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com> <49A82351.8090009@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902271221k30134a9fg907bc477dfc3683@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:34:23 -0800 Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0902271534w70e116d8s672d43159f94c38d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which USB device on which controller? From: Mark Knecht To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: df1016fb-45de-4f3e-a1ed-b17f9ce46675 X-Archives-Hash: 8e30bacdf5507fef823bc1861023894c On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Grant wrote: > > But that's OK isn't it? =C2=A0I don't need 2.0 speeds between each webcam > and the controller, I just need the increased overall bandwidth of a > 2.0 controller so one of the 1.1 webcams doesn't use all of it. =C2=A0I g= et > the feeling I have a misconception somewhere along the line here. > Could someone straighten me out? > > - Grant But if your 1.1 webcam slows the bus down to 12Mb/S and then uses that much bandwidth (or a large portion of it) there wouldn't be any time left for the controller to go back to 2.0 speeds anyway. Plan on 12Mb/S max for all devices in total if you plug the device into the 2.0 bus. - Mark