From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LP4Wy-0004HL-KB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:31:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 269C3E0555; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2F5E0555 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so3323516wff.10 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=spWvnQ4PXPNFwwN8ynxv/L3ttO0EhiO/N/v6Dnkp7YI=; b=qmkktAoxnT4Qf6pPQsLliOP1SEr70cuGU5OwAonfKNm0iGWGXUzePfnXOGfVpMZkHI 1YOi5TiRSYBAjHk4SntIFRsmIGJyGTBSDpGe3WuIwb/g/IFVGCjhnY/GG/ml9f37nh+o ORcPkvmZ1TxenbrSynK18Qv2cQAEr7PPbkRN8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YC+8Z+w8Y65Vq/Cvz+sGjdRweXCKp07TL+o6EbvpX3l9emUAHE5qbiHT3F+1zBBrjq T6YKMB3LHq6br/+XN55rJzil3Ea9Xth//VjVlsSdCMrqrSGccXq56+pdTN+TOEMJc4QP +135+TaNMsjHIsPe8hNfbzXcTk9fBPWiCZOgQ= Received: by 10.142.173.14 with SMTP id v14mr2596864wfe.116.1232411504229; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.217.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0901191631h2577f67cge7976962fd754e6a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:44 -0800 From: "Mark Knecht" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages... In-Reply-To: <49751842.4060601@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bdc1c8b0901181426p1c1f78bs3ca0ae50f2d648b1@mail.gmail.com> <4974FC20.1090809@konstantinhansen.de> <5bdc1c8b0901191437t18768de9j8b39dd7bccdca593@mail.gmail.com> <497508FD.6090109@gmail.com> <58965d8a0901191603m33031717xb3d7ac787e91893c@mail.gmail.com> <49751842.4060601@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 762ff96e-1567-442e-bb44-6550de006087 X-Archives-Hash: 1b0487a99f02583317130d5e7dc8fc80 On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Dale wrote: > > Hence the question, should this be a default option? I'm not the only > one that has ran into this. > > Dale Maybe it's a forest for trees thing but it's in the man page and shows up early in Gentoo Portage documentation: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/faq.xml I don't think it's required for all folks so I don't think it should be default. It does result in longer emerge cycles as it grabs and builds more code on average. Many folks might not want that. Just my thoughts, Mark