From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LL0sh-00070w-1A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:49:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1160E02A6; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.157]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C0E02A6 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so3067089yxp.46 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2xlBZlPzASSP+gBAVIIU/FHxbuYPaaXxcMf9byYL9h8=; b=SqjQnUUNafN7nyw7BFEAjntnNOjXzi0H5jEh8X1OA9+sX2uxqHMz6s4kgdYJjXBp2A qLbQwxmppTOf4V2DhW/7kTgXYFhlHVRdOlTX8jvLN+nZpyDPPUruWxpKiw5F7Arshb8l Gr0N1B6x2KZ7tHujxMrkyPhpebJYSLRveUTCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=jkw/FPngum6NleCqRPYDX7AkaRaOw9462bwqgCRdkHPcBkyZkNliPA3EltefQ2pQKw QWBC9H5eu4KpuAfgJ2p1H37OXaVZK3YYMpSswpiBXNFLJQ9YbxF2FJYmiIf9v6LOqpDb WVHG72Rictwe+WL8OYMpVZLIdz41DjkDYOCt0= Received: by 10.150.206.11 with SMTP id d11mr2558499ybg.209.1231444165113; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.203.21 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:49:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0901081149s54cc6df2q7194d06af019792e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:49:25 -0800 From: "Mark Knecht" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Please explain why this new 'emerge @preserved-rebuild' is good? In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5bdc1c8b0901080920g1a0edb11r466c26bb0e7c98a1@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0901081003j72b07cdfve2247ff81cdd3dc2@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0901081024x5576722qb4317d17e16bef9b@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0901081055y18f26d7fy38c28a86de7184c3@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0901081129h452a06d8u236a5f15474dd5a9@mail.gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0901081139q5ae65e68i94146b22df63ea12@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 68b36e50-dc43-42de-95a2-5ce3cb080441 X-Archives-Hash: 4430b83b5b67a9dbd0a3ea147e73e69f On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: >> >> >> warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11, >> >> >> not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to >> >> >> `FC_GetFunctionList@NSS_3.4' >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to >> >> >> `NSC_ModuleDBFunc@NSS_3.4' >> >> >> /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11: undefined reference to >> >> >> `NSC_GetFunctionList@NSS_3.4' >> >> >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> >> >> make[4]: *** [contact-print-test] Error 1 >> >> >> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> >> > >> >> > Hmm, and the mystery deepens... It looks like the source of the issue >> >> > is >> >> > the >> >> > "warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11, >> >> > not >> >> > found" message - libsoftokn3.so has the ModuleDBFunc symbol in it, >> >> > and >> >> > it is >> >> > owned by the nss package, so I'm not sure what is going on there. >> >> > What >> >> > does >> >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libsoft*" return? >> >> > -James >> >> > >> >> >> >> Version 12 apparently: >> >> >> >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libsoft* >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn.a /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so >> >> /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.chk /usr/lib/nss/libsoftokn3.so.12 >> >> lightning ~ # >> > >> > Very interesting - so you have the Evolution build using the .11 version >> > of >> > libnss3, but you have ther .12 version of libsoftkn3 - what do you see >> > from >> > a "ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*"? >> > >> lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3* >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11 >> /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12 >> lightning ~ # > > Aha! And which of the versioned .so's is libnss3.so linking to? > lightning ~ # ls -l /usr/lib/nss/libnss3* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2009-01-08 10:00 /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so -> libnss3.so.12 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 560376 2008-11-25 17:02 /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1337104 2009-01-08 10:00 /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12 lightning ~ #