From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-77364-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JdPHh-0001CI-JV
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:26:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1B77E07CB;
Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:26:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835FEE07CB
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:26:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2269600wfd.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=oPluGOScrKYJMKn0WxOEgasG5+Jv0suIX/Ruut4XDvU=;
b=jDKKwEUA1cnkN1k6EYuGcTzO6hkMa832Rz7ufkF/FMfkJo4ih11oyTJuyNRuxqpqy9U2ybniSgy+piumH76lNDFhPQCXkekyjPOWxXVEuiObCMAvmSR1T9QOqnrsKIPIiqspVglPBb4npCTO01NnLi8OIK9TJHDivD1BymXM49w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=L2lp5UuLD/F8rs6Fzgi9ettjUqooFVMHOVoSlTra7kkWo9Kb3yX913LASVc5e7JdUOy/5wBb9DVYfBicao/sRjtFj2T4CqMd68QwAwmy2uuUgAMZW2ts8CcvJQTqvKmQ0ODtsQd4UTK0POLydero+/ecCzUbTdNfWnxVPqoTwMA=
Received: by 10.142.11.2 with SMTP id 2mr3686808wfk.223.1206275199815;
Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.234.21 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0803230526h4df59243oec7606fdf53b2200@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:26:39 -0700
From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
In-Reply-To: <200803230807.31088.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <49bf44f10803221007v27627160xa0b0daadc4bcc0ff@mail.gmail.com>
<200803221911.33486.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
<47E590A7.9070203@ep.mine.nu>
<200803230807.31088.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
X-Archives-Salt: f967b8c5-dc27-4df5-88fb-7e5a58479b62
X-Archives-Hash: ba65fe8ba5163ae3bb3d3fe09d812ea2
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
<volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> wrote:
> On Sonntag, 23. M=E4rz 2008, Neil Walker wrote:
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > price/performance still favours AMD.
> >
> > How on earth do you justify that statement?
>
>
> AMD Athlon64 X2 EE 6000+ 129=80 (boxed)
>
> Intel(R) Core 2 Duo E6850 234=80
> Intel(R) Core 2 Duo E4700 134=80 (not boxed).
>
> --
> gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
I find Tom;s Hardware is a nice site to refer to:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list