From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaJSC-00041a-M4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:36:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2BE7E046C; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A11E046C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so4190290wfd.10 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JhsAkuEsEsRW0puL+4+Oc9nES/NJPPxW4HR4BP0BTPQ=; b=gtEgklPVqWCylcHVyMsnPaUrTmKSQfDPSiVtwyG5izp+HJGbdrLS5/uVl8SiFgs/WjQ1YsBq76Sjv9d7n3rJqZDFFyV8i1zNLd1t6y2YKgfM0esPVsoETdZSlBadmS3cBAQU97C196gXTCs+F7AKY/1ejzaPwawBPdCTNiOZRSA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tAetvHWVb93YSzb2LAgZG2aqBMVQx+k5NO2VG6vvs346bjG2HUYddd7+2rQQPOtOV7kA6He015lOr/5OIM74f2SzDRy9doKcFg2J2peOcT1HOH4udL6tuTHAUWdV1ZxdABgPUdb2ClGjF0+W6MAnccSccdXaBX3g3wizu1uMumA= Received: by 10.142.133.15 with SMTP id g15mr5420899wfd.178.1205537806250; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.234.21 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0803141636q3142e580oe9daba625bbfac7c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:36:46 -0700 From: "Mark Knecht" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Status of Gentoo In-Reply-To: <47DB0001.3000209@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47D6333E.9020003@ihug.co.nz> <5bdc1c8b0803111000g118efcd8tb3bc98d1865e5f75@mail.gmail.com> <20080314132348.3bcee472@pascal.spore.ath.cx> <5bdc1c8b0803141206o7a9acbaau149e392574fb2747@mail.gmail.com> <47DB0001.3000209@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4f936cd8-ae42-459b-8630-52105fbec163 X-Archives-Hash: daf25372faeb06eb17bb3e2e2f94d426 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Filipe Sousa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark Knecht wrote: > > | On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dan Farrell wrote: > | > | It's an interesting question and one I've not tried to test. Does an > | AMD64 machine running a 32-bit or 64-bit install run faster or slower > > | with one or the other. For all of my everyday work - Gnome, Firefox, > | web browsing, email, MythTV, etc., it's been my assumption that there > | wouldn't be any noticeble difference. I run 64-bit but assume I'd run > > | at more or less the same speed if I ran 32-bit. I may be wrong. Anyone > | have any measured data? Same machine, two installs? > > I have a few numbers from genlop -t > > > These times are from the same machine: > abit ip35 pro, c2quad q6600 (2.4ghz), 4gb ram, (320+320) sataII raid0 (155-MB/s) > > - -- > Filipe Sousa Nice numbers and nice machine. Must have set you back a bit. ;-) It seems when I match up exact revisions you're getting something between a 10-15% speed increase. Quite nice. Do we know that the amount code compiled is identical? I imagine everything you show is correct since the speed increase is pretty consistent from app to app. Great stuff. Thanks. Cheers, Mark -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list