From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:23:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0511161023h1cf5325bkd454bf626ca06500@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy <tracyde@gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> (DISCLAIMER: Let me start off by saying that this is truly not a flame but
> more of a concern. So please do not flame me for stating my
> opinions/concerns.)
<SNIP>
Understood. I certainly didn't take it that way.
>
> I have been an avid Gentoo User for 2 and 1/2 years now.
About the same as me.
<SNIP>
> In the past I
> have always leaned toward ~x86 (I love bleeding edge). But since this was
> going to be a new install I decided to do the preferred method and set all
> ~x86 flags via /etc/portage/package.keywords for specific packages.
Right.
>
> Now since we have the background we will get to the questions at hand.
> During this install I have run into nothing but problems.
<SNIP>
... with a slight modification I am using LVM2 for /usr /usr/portage
> /opt /var /tmp /home (I figured I would take advantage of some setuid
> security procedures). Part way through the online handbook I noticed that
> they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers
> thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot. So
> I installed everything according to the handbook and all went well until I
> restarted.
Yes, but I've done FC installs that did the same thing. It's not
limited to Gentoo.
<BIG SNIP --- IT'S ABOVE MY PAY GRADE>
>
> So now I am waiting for the whole system to recompile using ~x86 (the so
> called "Unstable" packages) and I will see if that works or not.
Bummer. The Gentoo install is a lot of work. To completely restart is
painful. Was there really no other option? I don't remember you asking
about this. Did I miss it?
>
> I am seriously reconsidering finding another OS to use, this whole headache
> has been totally ridiculous. I could see this if I would have emerged all
> of the unstable packages to begin with or even perform a Stage1 install
> after the developers decided to make the Stage3 the default. But I didn't I
> did everything according to the documentation (and I triple checked that I
> did not skip anything).
>
> So with all of this said if the developers do not start testing everything a
> little more thoroughly then I predict there will be a serious drop in the
> number of Gentoo Followers out there. Especially if a Gentoo Veteren has
> this hard of a time installing the operating system that I love.
In some ways I agree. I have an AMD64 machine (I'm writing you from
it) that has a LOT of packages as ~amd64 to make it usable. I
recognize that this is newer hardware and I expected this would be
required, but recently I've noticed portage getting hinky about ~x86
vs. ~amd64. My /etc/postage/package.use file is getting weird trying
to keep up. Portage is trying to downgrade things that are marked
~x86. I change them to ~amd64 and it lets me keep them. Something
feels wrong about that.
But at least my system works. (mostly...) I have no complaints. Just concerns...
>
> When a branch is marked stable all of the packages in that branch should
> work, yes there will always be configuration glitches but the problems I
> have had during this install were not from configuration glitches. They are
> what looks like incompatible packages and numerous other things. If Gentoo
> is going to continue to grow then we as a community need to speak up about
> things like this.
>
Well, yes and no. I don't think that 'stable' is the same as
'guaranteed'. None the less I agree with what I think is the sentiment
of your statement. In some of the online polls it seems that Gentoo's
popularity has dropped a bit lately. Personally I'm more and more
impressed with it every day. It's only been on my AMD64 machine that
I've seen many issues.
I will admit that I have a big concern about an upcoming MySQL update
that is probably going to break my whole TV network here. Due to my
fear I haven't upgraded MySQL and will likely come back ranting myself
sometime in December when I'm probably forced to do it. We'll see...
;-)
Best of luck getting the problems worked out.
cheers,
Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-16 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5bdc1c8b0511161023h1cf5325bkd454bf626ca06500@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox