* [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
@ 2005-11-17 10:27 askar k
2005-11-17 10:37 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 10:53 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: askar k @ 2005-11-17 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]
Hello!
I have packages CD. Mounted it and did #export PKGDIR="/mnt/cdrom"
When I do #emerge --usepkg <packagename> - sometimes it works, but sometimes
it doesn't work and bedins compiling.
For example, I wanted to install kde from package CD but it goes to
compiling, though I see a lot of tbz files for kde.
Can anybody tell what do I do wrong?
Thanks,
askar
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 429 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 10:27 [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem askar k
@ 2005-11-17 10:37 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 11:18 ` askar k
2005-11-17 10:53 ` Neil Bothwick
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nagatoro @ 2005-11-17 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
askar k wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have packages CD. Mounted it and did #export PKGDIR="/mnt/cdrom"
>
> When I do #emerge --usepkg <packagename> - sometimes it works, but
> sometimes it doesn't work and bedins compiling.
> For example, I wanted to install kde from package CD but it goes to
> compiling, though I see a lot of tbz files for kde.
> Can anybody tell what do I do wrong?
A guess would be that the packages that portage want's to compile
isn't on the CD. Not all packages from portage is there... Check tha
package names and versions that want's to compile against the CD.
--
Naga
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 10:37 ` Nagatoro
@ 2005-11-17 11:18 ` askar k
2005-11-17 11:28 ` Chris Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: askar k @ 2005-11-17 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
> A guess would be that the packages that portage want's to compile
> isn't on the CD. Not all packages from portage is there... Check tha
> package names and versions that want's to compile against the CD.
>
> --
> Naga
Thanks. Seems there's no kde itself, but many its components.
How is the package CD useful then??? Can't understand. Very sad.
askar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 11:18 ` askar k
@ 2005-11-17 11:28 ` Chris Cox
2005-11-17 14:31 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Cox @ 2005-11-17 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thursday 17 November 2005 05:18, askar k wrote:
> > A guess would be that the packages that portage want's to compile
> > isn't on the CD. Not all packages from portage is there... Check tha
> > package names and versions that want's to compile against the CD.
> >
> > --
> > Naga
>
> Thanks. Seems there's no kde itself, but many its components.
> How is the package CD useful then??? Can't understand. Very sad.
>
> askar
So many different ways to build packages with many different USE flags.
Besides, why would you want to use someone elses pre-compiled package? You
have a lot more control over it by building it from source and Gentoo *is
not* a binary distro.
--
Chris
Linux 2.6.14-gentoo-r2 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP
05:26:35 up 1 day, 1:41, 10 users, load average: 0.12, 0.11, 0.28
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 11:28 ` Chris Cox
@ 2005-11-17 14:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 8:12 ` askar k
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2005-11-17 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 472 bytes --]
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:28:32 -0600, Chris Cox wrote:
> Besides, why would you want to use someone elses pre-compiled package?
> You have a lot more control over it by building it from source
To get a working desktop as quickly as possible. It is no different from
doing a stage 3 installation, it gets you working faster, then you can
optimise at your leisure.
--
Neil Bothwick
Never get into fights with ugly people because they have nothing to lose.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 14:31 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2005-11-18 8:12 ` askar k
2005-11-18 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 21:14 ` Nick Rout
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: askar k @ 2005-11-18 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/17/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:28:32 -0600, Chris Cox wrote:
> To get a working desktop as quickly as possible. It is no different from
> doing a stage 3 installation, it gets you working faster, then you can
> optimise at your leisure.
But, they say you can optimize your system when you use 1st or 2nd stage...
Is it possible optimize after using 3rd stage for installation?
askar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-18 8:12 ` askar k
@ 2005-11-18 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 12:24 ` askar k
2005-11-18 21:14 ` Nick Rout
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2005-11-18 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 797 bytes --]
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:12:22 +0500, askar k wrote:
> But, they say you can optimize your system when you use 1st or 2nd
> stage... Is it possible optimize after using 3rd stage for installation?
Yes. Set up your USE and compiler flags as you want and do emerge -e
world. Some say you should run it twice, or there are scripts on the
forums that will take care of the few packages that do need to be
compiled twice for full optimisation. Whether it is worth the extra time
of compiling twice is arguable as most packages will be recompiled in due
course anyway.
The only difference between doing it this way and a stage 1 is
that you can use the computer while everything is compiling.
--
Neil Bothwick
There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-18 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2005-11-18 12:24 ` askar k
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: askar k @ 2005-11-18 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/18/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:12:22 +0500, askar k wrote:
>
> > But, they say you can optimize your system when you use 1st or 2nd
> > stage... Is it possible optimize after using 3rd stage for installation?
>
> Yes. Set up your USE and compiler flags as you want and do emerge -e
> world. Some say you should run it twice, or there are scripts on the
> forums that will take care of the few packages that do need to be
> compiled twice for full optimisation. Whether it is worth the extra time
> of compiling twice is arguable as most packages will be recompiled in due
> course anyway.
>
> The only difference between doing it this way and a stage 1 is
> that you can use the computer while everything is compiling.
>
Thanks.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-18 8:12 ` askar k
2005-11-18 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2005-11-18 21:14 ` Nick Rout
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Nick Rout @ 2005-11-18 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:12:22 +0500
askar k <askar.gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:28:32 -0600, Chris Cox wrote:
> > To get a working desktop as quickly as possible. It is no different from
> > doing a stage 3 installation, it gets you working faster, then you can
> > optimise at your leisure.
> But, they say you can optimize your system when you use 1st or 2nd stage...
> Is it possible optimize after using 3rd stage for installation?
>
> askar
you want to emerge kde-meta, not emerge kde. The binary packages on the
latest CD use the new kde individual builds. Foled me too the first
time.
>
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 10:27 [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem askar k
2005-11-17 10:37 ` Nagatoro
@ 2005-11-17 10:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 8:14 ` askar k
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2005-11-17 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:27:40 +0000, askar k wrote:
> When I do #emerge --usepkg <packagename> - sometimes it works, but
> sometimes it doesn't work and bedins compiling.
> For example, I wanted to install kde from package CD but it goes to
> compiling, though I see a lot of tbz files for kde.
> Can anybody tell what do I do wrong?
Because you have emerge sync'd since the packages CD was built, your
portage tree contains newer versions of many of the packages, so emerge
tries to install those. As there is no package available for the newer
versions, it tries to download the source and compile.
You need to use --usepkgonly (-K), --usepkg (-k) means "use a package if
one is available, otherwise build from source. If that doesn't work, use
specific version numbers to ensure the version on the CD is installed
emerge -Kav =cate-gory/package-x.y.z-rN
--
Neil Bothwick
I am neither for nor against apathy.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem
2005-11-17 10:53 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2005-11-18 8:14 ` askar k
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: askar k @ 2005-11-18 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 11/17/05, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:27:40 +0000, askar k wrote:
>
> Because you have emerge sync'd since the packages CD was built, your
> portage tree contains newer versions of many of the packages, so emerge
> tries to install those. As there is no package available for the newer
> versions, it tries to download the source and compile.
I think in package CD there was no kde itself at all. I didn't emerge
sync before using Package CD.
askar
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-18 21:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-17 10:27 [gentoo-user] binary package installation problem askar k
2005-11-17 10:37 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 11:18 ` askar k
2005-11-17 11:28 ` Chris Cox
2005-11-17 14:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 8:12 ` askar k
2005-11-18 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 12:24 ` askar k
2005-11-18 21:14 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-17 10:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-18 8:14 ` askar k
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox