From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JcCvH-00053a-E3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:02:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 914C0E0505; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.242]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64989E0505 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k27so628616hsc.2 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:02:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=jiu3C0L7dzDdvWEzg/yxxzgY/Z6Oatfz8DX3uupxyho=; b=TZObIlsmgJPB5sJMvqVYfbK9XxpRw4orLNA8rOamzrm/YV0qtvj2FUws1pYa24FxnvcLEXYE9BRyNCeNbVFcEaXpn38F2Fys63JuVFXWBDYC2OapxR7vqTjINSbAfCLrgnsKR2KR3V7xq7zZOeMnTFCtGtHbaYzgfDdgawFgjqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=b+c4M9tGnHPP2i/oydMNj+XwLdaWnWS5a9hF2UAP3/LBggFjbKrHFmcPAMKQisII3v0yGsCVyUo6zbQZMHdn1qLJGMSWXrxOFZGBQbduzvTITKrd5fb8UDOADMPjmxgM+RmYqtyHsLFNuqmXadXCvckxk80KUshnEvY2TWgnhBY= Received: by 10.114.110.1 with SMTP id i1mr2755646wac.112.1205989347558; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.209.17 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58b221670803192202u2672ef40m91e85c40b9d85224@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:02:27 +0800 From: "=?GB2312?B?wO641Q==?=" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] weird xorg/nvidia-drivers 169.09-r1 behaviour In-Reply-To: <12a679470803191547t4fa3290dy154bd0a57cb5cce9@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_786_7098047.1205989347550" References: <12a679470803191547t4fa3290dy154bd0a57cb5cce9@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: ae849bc6-0929-4b6c-aae4-cd641b4b6f7a X-Archives-Hash: 8ab37913f504cce3bb451f5a54ee0ff0 ------=_Part_786_7098047.1205989347550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline in your xorg.conf In the module section, try adding the following line load "dbe" Then try to run conky from your terminal-emulator, does it say something that "double framebuffer enabled?" Also,i found the conky in ~x86 portage a little of weird, 1. it displays my uptime very strange, a very very very very long digit, something like 34343433333333333333333333, oh, my computer never run so much time without powering down 2. mpd is not working with conky, maybe this is a problem with mpd, but i a= m not sure hope this would help On 3/20/08, Jos=E9 Pedro Saraiva wrote: > > Been using nvidia-drivers-100.14.19 without problems but I wish to upgrad= e > to latest stable version, in a hope to reduce random suspend crashes I've > been having with latest tuxonice-sources. > The thing is... once I'm up and running with nvidia-drivers 169.09-r1 xor= g > and conky have this strange behaviour with conky window overlapping each > time it refreshes. > First screenshot is my desktop in it's normal state, 2nd one is the > behaviour I'm talking about... The only window that always overlaps is th= e > "network" section, and the conkyrc options are the same as for other conk= y > instances. > > Anyone have a clue what may be causing this? > > > > Best regards! > > --=20 Easy things should be easy, hard things should at least be possilbe. Powered by Gentoo Linux ------=_Part_786_7098047.1205989347550 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

in your xorg.conf

In the module section, try adding the fo= llowing line

load "dbe"

Then try to run conky from yo= ur terminal-emulator, does it say something that

"double framebu= ffer enabled?"

Also,i found the conky in ~x86 portage a little of weird,&= nbsp;

1. it displays my uptime very strange, a very very very very lo= ng digit, something like 34343433333333333333333333,

oh, my computer = never run so much time without powering down

2. mpd is not working with conky, maybe this is a problem with mpd, but = i am not sure

hope this would help

On 3/20/08, Jos=E9 Pedro Sar= aiva <nocive@gmail.com> w= rote:
Been using nvidia-drivers-100.14.19 without problems but I wish to upgrade = to latest stable version, in a hope to reduce random suspend crashes I'= ve been having with latest tuxonice-sources.
The thing is... once I'= m up and running with nvidia-drivers 169.09-r1 xorg and conky have this str= ange behaviour with conky window overlapping each time it refreshes.
First screenshot is my desktop in it's normal state, 2nd one is the beh= aviour I'm talking about... The only window that always overlaps is the= "network" section, and the conkyrc options are the same as for o= ther conky instances.

Anyone have a clue what may be causing this?



Best regard= s!




--
Easy = things should be easy, hard things should at least be possilbe.
Powered = by Gentoo Linux ------=_Part_786_7098047.1205989347550-- -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list