From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-109335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1NvGmN-0002Is-23 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:09:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E8C1E0B2F; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E91E0B2F for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so6332459pwj.40 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=1iyrAuQNenikiSbSHroAlyNDGuG7ICuIP0MtsO9gV30=; b=duv5okCEteujt4P8uWzXanByUowSxeQkrTu27bSWeVTyLocGxHaKYWdRCCOaN+0ePk dMMSUnOliOguk9/hFLulQo7ugGc3gP2jaBXMLE+7mc0P1LoeIlJDVW8EZWSIvEyaeQj+ lZ2c4F6eLDWxhwxBHuI9Vsfdd7LNDz7vYq1Xw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SGSLeJ67EHCWD0ozoUDysNEku51+0U75fdqcQoBOfRInIxecA2mOu+SvlLx9xAXKhi LSmFJiwlO4KecOtaEMPkdjIHFZUN4sUTAr/VKSqP8YGuJg77OxVQqTnzdxhlt0t2b2Oq gQz4PeyjRJ9b2Z64eQ7aojSmREjiWgUhBBs3U= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.229.15 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BACD05D.2020906@gmail.com> References: <4BACD05D.2020906@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:08:54 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d14e0fd5049b7a0c Received: by 10.141.214.24 with SMTP id r24mr796822rvq.264.1269637734629; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58965d8a1003261408n7d73e651oe2fb6cca8a0eaaa2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libvdpau (?) From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 86b0ea94-1f07-459b-991f-adfb4b2dc167 X-Archives-Hash: 2c6f3f9248291b7815c002e75841c134 On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to compile ffmpeg with vdpau - direct NVidia hardware > acceleration. This is a configuration flag for ffmpeg. > > Setting the "vdpau" use flag seems to set the configuration flag, but > also brings in the "x11-libs/libvdpau" libraries which I think I do not > want, as my NVidia proprietary driver provides these libraries. AFAIK Nvidia split the vdpau off into libvdpau late last year sometime. On my system I use both nvidia-drivers and libvdpau without issue. libvdpau provides libvdpau.so while nvidia-drivers provides libvdpau_nvidia.so Here are my versions: x11-libs/libvdpau-0.3-r2 x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-195.36.15 Are you using older versions? I use ~amd64 so maybe if you run stable it has the older versions.