From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-109335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NvGmN-0002Is-23
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:09:19 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E8C1E0B2F;
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E91E0B2F
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:08:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwj10 with SMTP id 10so6332459pwj.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=1iyrAuQNenikiSbSHroAlyNDGuG7ICuIP0MtsO9gV30=;
b=duv5okCEteujt4P8uWzXanByUowSxeQkrTu27bSWeVTyLocGxHaKYWdRCCOaN+0ePk
dMMSUnOliOguk9/hFLulQo7ugGc3gP2jaBXMLE+7mc0P1LoeIlJDVW8EZWSIvEyaeQj+
lZ2c4F6eLDWxhwxBHuI9Vsfdd7LNDz7vYq1Xw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=SGSLeJ67EHCWD0ozoUDysNEku51+0U75fdqcQoBOfRInIxecA2mOu+SvlLx9xAXKhi
LSmFJiwlO4KecOtaEMPkdjIHFZUN4sUTAr/VKSqP8YGuJg77OxVQqTnzdxhlt0t2b2Oq
gQz4PeyjRJ9b2Z64eQ7aojSmREjiWgUhBBs3U=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.150.229.15 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BACD05D.2020906@gmail.com>
References: <4BACD05D.2020906@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:08:54 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d14e0fd5049b7a0c
Received: by 10.141.214.24 with SMTP id r24mr796822rvq.264.1269637734629; Fri,
26 Mar 2010 14:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <58965d8a1003261408n7d73e651oe2fb6cca8a0eaaa2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libvdpau (?)
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 86b0ea94-1f07-459b-991f-adfb4b2dc167
X-Archives-Hash: 2c6f3f9248291b7815c002e75841c134
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to compile ffmpeg with vdpau - direct NVidia hardware
> acceleration. This is a configuration flag for ffmpeg.
>
> Setting the "vdpau" use flag seems to set the configuration flag, but
> also brings in the "x11-libs/libvdpau" libraries which I think I do not
> want, as my NVidia proprietary driver provides these libraries.
AFAIK Nvidia split the vdpau off into libvdpau late last year
sometime. On my system I use both nvidia-drivers and libvdpau without
issue. libvdpau provides libvdpau.so while nvidia-drivers provides
libvdpau_nvidia.so
Here are my versions:
x11-libs/libvdpau-0.3-r2
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-195.36.15
Are you using older versions? I use ~amd64 so maybe if you run stable
it has the older versions.