From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpOEG-0000ob-1M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:53:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9052E0D4B; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAE2E0D4B for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so3753252gyg.40 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:53:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cx/uttOLKhsazty70OtmZLSRMHDcnmrqK2kY0yf909U=; b=n27LFAb552oMW7UArezThq9pAWYu1Yx/Wkcgrwz73iXcgkxFEABeEQa83W4fPM4fbZ p54qhjCk14tbZiqFDvecpvvCTgTXqL/zf4ltRc2vRNZWhVDnbDiSIfG41lMlKBXYXxCx tNaBSYxTWfMSwtksrB+jo7bDG9IHrd0ePmTfI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=onzadqjlZrXJlzWHVdIv5yRvPAlHbhP+J/9T+8ShH8nl2OICR0YVmd5Bjdb9dqK6jy zkKXyYI9lUUH0U0iY+nfklzrBFZhXqwYlVAGxBZK9AMPDkuBUv109qhcf49w3IHHPrv3 iosl+RbUc8DfNAYbcElnc2DaWzlvbsj78+YaE= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.213.21 with SMTP id l21mr1630424ybg.166.1268236399344; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:53:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100310143523.2e53b74b@digimed.co.uk> References: <20100310013650.GA6034@waltdnes.org> <4B979D21.4040206@libertytrek.org> <20100310134719.7fe66c8b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4B97A508.8070204@libertytrek.org> <20100310140922.77fc4045@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4B97AC47.5030806@libertytrek.org> <20100310143523.2e53b74b@digimed.co.uk> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:53:19 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 89d7e1886613404c Message-ID: <58965d8a1003100753y2c05265s733a3999ff14663f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with "make oldconfig" 2.6.30-8 ==> 2.6.31 From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 620d4afc-2c0d-4eed-815d-d8987d074cdd X-Archives-Hash: 0a02834b7eb084f0f12bb5dc9c53ca23 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > No you're not. But it is far easier to miss important changes without > oldconfig to point them out to you by shoving them in your face. That's how I use it. I do oldconfig as a kind of "kernel config diff" and then follow it by menuconfig and a quick browsing of the critical settings to make sure they look sane enough to boot. As long as it boots and supports my disks and filesystems I can sort out any minor settings/module changes after that.