From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Good fast IDE hard drive but cheap and BIG.
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:09:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58965d8a0909241809r50fde333l6cbe81ab2a30b639@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ABC15EB.50105@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> walt wrote:
>> On 09/24/2009 12:29 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> USB. There is another idea. Ooops, out of USB plugs too. Crap, I
>>> can't put in a drive without buying something to plug it into. LOL I
>>> do have USB 2.0 on here. I have to have 2.0 for the printer but my
>>> camera has to have 1.0. Weird I know.
>>
>> There are so many interesting posts in this thread I don't know which
>> one to reply to :o) Just FYI, USB 3 has just been ratified, so we can
>> expect ultra-fast USB-3 drives in the (near?) future, which should be as
>> fast or faster than SATA-II.
>>
>> The point I really want to make is regarding your question about which
>> disk drive to buy. I have drives from three different manufacturers at
>> the moment, and they are all superb and incredibly cheap -- but that low
>> cost comes at a price (does that make any sense?).
>>
>> I've had to return two drives in the last three years or so because of
>> catastrophic failure while still under warranty (amazing!). In both
>> cases the replacement drives have been absolutely perfect for years now.
>>
>> In other words, disk manufacturers have apparently decided to abandon
>> strict quality control in favor of low price, and seem happy to replace
>> failed drives as a substitute for quality control. It must be a
>> profitable
>> strategy because they all seem to be doing it. But be prepared for drive
>> failures from *every* manufacturer -- and then buy whatever is on sale
>> for
>> the lowest price.
>>
>>
>>
>
> One thing I have noticed about hard drives in my experience. When you
> plug that puppy in and power it up, let it run for a good long while.
> Overnight is good, a few days is even better, a week or more is even
> better still from the mechanical point of view. I remember this from
> when I rebuilt my Moms old motor in her car years ago. It said in the
> book and from several mechanics, once you crank it, run it for at least
> 30 minutes and at different rpms. The longer the better. It should get
> to its normal temperature before even thinking about cutting it off. Do
> NOT cut the engine off unless it is really serious. The first few
> minutes that a motor runs is crucial. If you start it and just run it a
> couple minutes, it won't ever be the same. I was also told that driving
> it is really good.
>
> I also remember this from way back when I was working on puters. I got
> a new job when winder 3.1 came out. Anyway. If a electronic device can
> survive the first couple to six months of usage, they usually last a
> while from the electronic point of view. That is short of spilling your
> beer in it or it getting hit by lightening or something like that. I
> have two 80Gb drives right now. One is a Maxtor and the other is a
> Western Digital. I bet there is a few people on this list that hate
> each one because they had one that failed. I haven't had any trouble
> with mine at all. They all fail eventually tho. I just hope one of
> mine fails when there is nothing important on it is all. ;-)
>
> Still comparing all the options. I got to start looking for a good SATA
> drive now. Just when I had a decent IDE drive all picked out too. LOL
When you look at hard drive reviews, they tend to be either 5 stars
("Perfect! Never a problem after 10 years!") or 0 stars ("Horrible,
died after 2 minutes! I got 2 more and they did the same thing!" etc).
I don't think there are a lot of ways for a hard drive to go bad
without it being catastrophic. Maybe bad sectors... but I consider
that catastrophic because they always seem to spread like cancer. If
there is one bad sector on a drive, I simply can't trust it.
That being said, I've had lots of hard drives from many brands and the
best combinations of price/speed/reliability I've had is Samsung. I'm
using 6 of them right now and after 2+ years of 24/7 usage none has
died yet. I'm sure someone here will have a horror story about a
Samsung drive to add to this thread. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-25 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-24 3:07 [gentoo-user] [OT] Good fast IDE hard drive but cheap and BIG Dale
2009-09-24 5:02 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-24 6:21 ` Dale
2009-09-24 5:12 ` kashani
2009-09-24 6:22 ` Dale
2009-09-24 18:42 ` Dale
2009-09-24 18:51 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-09-24 19:02 ` Dale
2009-09-24 19:02 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-24 19:14 ` Dale
2009-09-24 19:21 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-24 19:29 ` Dale
2009-09-24 20:51 ` kashani
2009-09-24 20:54 ` Dale
2009-09-24 23:47 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2009-09-25 0:59 ` Dale
2009-09-25 1:09 ` Paul Hartman [this message]
2009-09-25 1:21 ` Dale
2009-09-25 1:35 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-09-25 3:23 ` Dale
2009-09-25 9:01 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-09-25 9:22 ` Dale
2009-09-25 1:17 ` kashani
2009-09-25 1:26 ` Dale
2009-09-25 7:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-09-25 8:08 ` Dale
2009-09-25 1:14 ` Keith Dart
2009-09-24 19:04 ` [gentoo-user] " kashani
2009-09-24 19:29 ` Dale
2009-09-24 19:37 ` Paul Hartman
2009-09-24 19:44 ` James Ausmus
2009-09-24 20:22 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-09-24 20:48 ` James Ausmus
2009-09-25 5:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-10-16 16:24 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58965d8a0909241809r50fde333l6cbe81ab2a30b639@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox