From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MoLsq-0001mQ-Vy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5F4AE07D1; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com (mail-yw0-f196.google.com [209.85.211.196]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BB4E07D1 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh34 with SMTP id 34so402489ywh.10 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=C9fne6qDOGw0Z3w6wRH33F/9kStr44AsCyv47kfFt2g=; b=Z32nl00dY7oNAOPCfL0xnOXCHtZCLiw2Tg3fbqqfpAXFgPgElSn3XZMypB15Y2ZmVf rlkpAV5LgqMj+M69a9fqwOK88Tw+dGZcm95hlQ9Oc8h6OhLwdFxn8l3D0bK3fIMyJ3q6 taRsktRmYMjz19efSv2zoUqiw6y6dTujlkYfU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UNMX4qSVZt4X3ShjxiaIIOGtrhUQ0z/quQ+FkS0iwe8Zx5Fhr/o9N6b6FTAxl1qLy/ cYkIL6WS6rvgdhvUoh8wxVaBlpXmax9PWQ5PfbYw5QBHitHnE1owbzpJvp0RRneKhxP1 ITXYuwnn0mmR92Z7LYU6IYkLd9YA7EmRsDHkw= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.5.2 with SMTP id 2mr1611379ybe.300.1253212747318; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:39:07 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3bb5dd79f9fb3075 Message-ID: <58965d8a0909171139x1326a4e2vb5c79b0a31f4f40d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libssl3.so.12 not found, but why not? From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 4f7746f3-8d65-4d65-8e4d-651d3c0fa832 X-Archives-Hash: 0c610317bf6e52a73319ba5651a0b648 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:21 PM, walt wrote: > Two days ago after updating world on my ~amd64, at least two apps > can't find libssl.so.12 even though it's right where it should be. > > One difference I find between my working x86 and my broken ~amd64 > is the output of ldconfig -p: > > x86 machine: > #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.so > libssl3.so.12 (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so.12 <== minor number > libssl3.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so > > ~amd64 machine: > #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.do > libssl3.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/nss/libssl3.so > libssl3.so (libc6) => /opt/flash-libcompat/libssl3.so > > Note that the minor number (.12) doesn't show up even though there > is a correct and proper symlink for it in /usr/lib64/nss. > > Another source of confusion for me is that the programs that need > libssl3.so.12 are both linked against libssl3.so (no minor number) > but the error message specifically says that libssl3.so.12 can't be > found. > > Can anyone here make sense out of this info? > > Thanks! I'm on ~amd64: # ldconfig -p | grep ssl3 libssl3.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/nss/libssl3.so I guess you've got some 32-bit flash plugin installed? I'm using 64-bit browsers and flash plugin.