From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MiQT8-0007Bc-5v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:20:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F04F5E0922; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f175.google.com (mail-vw0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB082E0975 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so76973vws.32 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dRQt7tMIkWzAcwaQgcl5RLbMiN+g7oR5MrHnE8qubRg=; b=NLzNDoxowS9tEMefPDaGNl+pr5wZ9PW4ck4OG7bXc2Smb9QVaNiutkqFe1IgJbvVrQ D9a+LdfQPuneHUxjJSlVihMbANVr4EefJ9SlYIWo71tMW9MSSx0mOKKD4bGx1Yn9Rmbo +LQJMtGYVQ5o6S5VkQFuV7s1QUJxPI4XV1AWI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=eSi3DRxqYbeIpkZ5J0VmJ+cjCLoJmoJseqrGktPFa8wrx7/RZ8V2CJ7dobbh6KuTjF 9umpRPBAtSgt1LfYYOlp/s18SuDD+bxbFSsNFaiiWAV7Z7a2imHOSqRFzsVgXX+JJqu4 j3DhApo5v+hm80AnyYRzUiRntkk1Vsj9TP6po= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.253.17 with SMTP id a17mr11831851ybi.256.1251818932069; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:28:52 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: d3a60e9d2f95037c Message-ID: <58965d8a0909010828m478fa726u3992655a5b121553@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Possible bug with ~arch libgphoto2 and libexif? From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: e4807649-5d42-4c21-a4da-1f81ed695644 X-Archives-Hash: 1bc380544fe62a9a16ab3657c98af410 On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Arttu V. wrote: > Hello, > > Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which > almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something > probably right out of Monty Python: > > checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for libexif to use... yes > checking for libexif.la file in yes... wild guess that something is in yes > configure: WARNING: > * Warning: > * libtool file libexif.la could not be found. > * We may be linking against the WRONG library. > > checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes > checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes > checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes > checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes > checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes > checking libexif library flags... "-Lyes/lib -lexif" > checking libexif cpp flags... "-Iyes/include" > > Oh boy, I'm sure I'm running multilib, and using "yes" as my primary > path for my libraries. Anyone fought with the same thing and solved > it, or is this a new bug? Works for me using libgphoto2-2.4.7 and libexif-0.6.17 on ~amd64 checking for libexif to use... autodetect checking for LIBEXIF... yes checking whether we use a version of libexif with ExifData.ifd[]... yes checking libexif/exif-data.h usability... yes checking libexif/exif-data.h presence... yes checking for libexif/exif-data.h... yes checking for function exif_data_new in libexif... yes checking libexif library flags... "-lexif -lm " checking libexif cpp flags... "-I/usr/include/libexif " checking for libusb-config... /usr/bin/libusb-config configure: creating ./config.status