From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-99315-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Mh7a9-0001R4-TQ
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:57:58 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35C50E08F0
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f207.google.com (mail-gx0-f207.google.com [209.85.217.207])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6193E0ABA
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so4617336gxk.14
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/M34c7r4JOygqhT3nKn4wf4YVoP399NQK9WC9Lj23Vc=;
b=V34EO2NpCUU4zeAL6pK9AT25fYxEp0v5n5lfoJbrq1fKAIKbrpok/LxzDPCXNZoR+a
NLdVsJK+/sNHwkVdG4WVDIv8yL7h0i7zDB4paQgvc1jlV5t/1bwJEntMbo/NgLs3J6QH
cRBITZDI+IUxcPhg39mgjizLpuABerM5OL9Js=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=iqgi6juNuns2ZaqFu4KwMOGvBZ+6MI1HOmZQC8mcz2WPWGXIrbu/mvzqEAiN0fHIfv
pUWHYVj0ohWOszUR/V5lgShMkV2A3GVXNRx4MnMit9vd/IDHchTel9BlvfdXpAaQRr+v
KB2euJsy7DO1mhv3DCwjyzmXAjz6v+wXbxqC8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.150.26.5 with SMTP id 5mr11410379ybz.135.1251235164475; Tue,
25 Aug 2009 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <h71jkb$crf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <h71jkb$crf$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:19:24 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6d25c5865a0b2182
Message-ID: <58965d8a0908251419l312f1887xd16e6501cd05e87b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade
firefox/xul-runner?
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c2ea92a8-3a23-4731-8a81-f0bce70a0073
X-Archives-Hash: 040a3709ef940345bd27a16650f3fafe
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwards<grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
> week and then changed back to unstable this week?
I think so, yes. If you read the Changelog file, it shows this:
21 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
revert all stable keywords
20 Aug 2009; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
Stable for HPPA (bug #280393).
20 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
stable x86, security bug 280393