public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
@ 2009-08-20 21:26 Simon Hunt
  2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon Hunt @ 2009-08-20 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 317 bytes --]

I can't get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native resolution) or any widescreen
framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty bad because of
it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD 2400 XT video card.
The Radeon framebuffer "radeonfb" in the kernel doesn't support this card.
What can I do?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 369 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
  2009-08-20 21:26 [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer? Simon Hunt
@ 2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
  2009-08-20 23:55   ` Peter Humphrey
  2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
  2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2009-08-20 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Simon Hunt<chesemonkyloma@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can't get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native resolution) or any widescreen
> framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty bad because of
> it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD 2400 XT video card.
> The Radeon framebuffer "radeonfb" in the kernel doesn't support this card.
> What can I do?

Try uvesafb, it is (sometimes) able to utilize more modes than the
other framebuffers. The available resolutions are highly dependent on
your video hardware, though.

http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
  2009-08-20 21:26 [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer? Simon Hunt
  2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
  2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pk @ 2009-08-20 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Simon Hunt wrote:
> I can't get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native resolution) or any widescreen
> framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty bad because of
> it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD 2400 XT video card.
> The Radeon framebuffer "radeonfb" in the kernel doesn't support this card.
> What can I do?

Don't know the specifics of your hardware but I use vesa framebuffer
which works fine for me (stationary pc, radeon 3870). However, for some
reason, the radeon cards I have (all rv600+) do not seem to support the
standard vga modes; I had to use a tool (vbetest from package lrmi) to
find out the number to put into the kernel command line. I use vga=804
to achieve 1280x1024@24. Don't know if this will help but it can
probably (don't know for sure) find the supported modes...

HTH

Best regards

Peter K



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
  2009-08-20 21:26 [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer? Simon Hunt
  2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
  2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
@ 2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pk @ 2009-08-20 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Simon Hunt wrote:
> I can't get a 1680x1050 framebuffer (my native resolution) or any widescreen
> framebuffer on this intel iMac and the console looks pretty bad because of
> it. The best I can use is 1024x768. I have a Radeon HD 2400 XT video card.
> The Radeon framebuffer "radeonfb" in the kernel doesn't support this card.
> What can I do?

Oh, one more thing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions

Best regards

Peter K



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer?
  2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2009-08-20 23:55   ` Peter Humphrey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Humphrey @ 2009-08-20 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Thursday 20 August 2009 22:40:07 Paul Hartman wrote:

> The available resolutions are highly dependent on your video hardware,
> though. 

And the BIOS.

-- 
Rgds
Peter



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-20 23:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-20 21:26 [gentoo-user] Aluminum iMac framebuffer? Simon Hunt
2009-08-20 21:40 ` Paul Hartman
2009-08-20 23:55   ` Peter Humphrey
2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk
2009-08-20 23:26 ` pk

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox