From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-98325-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1MWWTD-0003iq-8f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:18:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77BDAE07B2; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.211.171]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF4DE07B2 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so715892ywh.9 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p2ZLbcrT+CtNNnehin3Nn6m7U1HLIxuFMozVFl3hTAU=; b=Kygkdk2zRafpFNNeYlxfXbmJ7lV/pPU4XMU05/JD3Q46iXsPwXrC71TvIDqJk40XF7 bI6ricaTqFdSL7SWb7UPuhEiVpV+g9XoipM++e3fRoutanJtFltktVoKaj5CvOoOpoD+ V/dqRPzHWxLnIuornpzP0sE+jYSE7K/xAw7xc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=brVvwtcN89uL+bG3aCoHj34MmhNeTyY2d3kDaFTeIQ0ECglisLOuvq5rvAeQ9y0eF0 +3jWbZpsx05xqpUcg0PrrdeOS4o/LBX9GYCceq8I5x+3WEPMLVtm3vge88SicgDg3/q6 Va5Qnxc75sTNoK9LH1CxRUKVyk/Klsv38Fh30= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.144.19 with SMTP id w19mr2220599ybn.159.1248963537083; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10907300517m40c7c7b5u4305dfa375ce920@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10907260346y62a6f95dyfda763fceb0bcb39@mail.gmail.com> <DC239B41-96A3-45F2-B85C-62140E346B43@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <49bf44f10907270544i5a5922ddo28d6a2c23d7ed6a8@mail.gmail.com> <4A6DE730.90103@f_philipp.fastmail.net> <49bf44f10907281052l184efbacvffd7fa1344ddbd2e@mail.gmail.com> <C20F6FFC-5600-4BF6-BF12-01E793709215@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <49bf44f10907290820k1bbf0ebct8ca7becceda19771@mail.gmail.com> <4A708607.3090203@f_philipp.fastmail.net> <49bf44f10907300517m40c7c7b5u4305dfa375ce920@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:18:57 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8471d65ffe5b80b1 Message-ID: <58965d8a0907300718n5404caecu8ab4b815afaa9c3e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1? From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0e3ebaee-7adf-464e-8e0d-9d5b908d6fe8 X-Archives-Hash: 78534cc04380af1ccb3869cb7e7433b9 On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Grant<emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote: > I read on this list that the kernel needs *some* swap, even just a > tiny amount, to function properly. Is that true? If so, do you think > it would be OK to put this tiny amount of swap on a cheap SSD? I have no swap and things work just fine. (8 gigs of RAM) Obviously, running without swap increases the chances of you running out of memory, but that has never happened to me.