From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-93571-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1LtWRO-00036f-6z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19256E053F; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f108.google.com (mail-qy0-f108.google.com [209.85.221.108]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0336E053F for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so3871614qyk.32 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xZRZnORWMC44hRZ4Msy8pNlkJjsT43YdOr9kJuo402I=; b=FvDSYYJwX6Idrp9mvMQA1jpwAeAbiOwxNzZAntbM/CbfYQ1cKzBcOBeMCHpsywLcnL G1Rx2ShtItQ8GqvYffacvRA3RCPA9jeA/QVyegGzhL+2xrw/XaYq5vAb7F+Z5AllnPDY Q1xGq45FCzxP1ktkJJ6FbQy10i66UqvE3UcI8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uyEVDmcK/J4WR7C8bqqDUXPuOFRap944OZVJzy76awD0ZtvdRWbyHS2ooqkMnQauaA Jp4tcfdSH8XNP7OTZEBJMMdbUzQ+g7AWQZx4XNGfl4h26+epn/CDEEyJyVg6qGevidQu uHcF8WRKScolnXJvo+URgXNY59OJK0UP58xX8= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.100.142 with SMTP id y14mr7289886vcn.73.1239668632659; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0904131700x51671760p70185c2b4e67aac5@mail.gmail.com> References: <5bdc1c8b0904131700x51671760p70185c2b4e67aac5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:23:52 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0add545abeb850ee Message-ID: <58965d8a0904131723m626d6e61j5bbfd2eab5be0280@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot? From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d6252c68-376e-455a-aa6d-b342f015769c X-Archives-Hash: 6852d9b44a5f4a2d147a346280250769 On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was > to be run at boot time or as a default level process? I have had mine at "default" forever and it seems to work fine.