From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-93571-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LtWRO-00036f-6z
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:54 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19256E053F;
	Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qy0-f108.google.com (mail-qy0-f108.google.com [209.85.221.108])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0336E053F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:23:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk6 with SMTP id 6so3871614qyk.32
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xZRZnORWMC44hRZ4Msy8pNlkJjsT43YdOr9kJuo402I=;
        b=FvDSYYJwX6Idrp9mvMQA1jpwAeAbiOwxNzZAntbM/CbfYQ1cKzBcOBeMCHpsywLcnL
         G1Rx2ShtItQ8GqvYffacvRA3RCPA9jeA/QVyegGzhL+2xrw/XaYq5vAb7F+Z5AllnPDY
         Q1xGq45FCzxP1ktkJJ6FbQy10i66UqvE3UcI8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=uyEVDmcK/J4WR7C8bqqDUXPuOFRap944OZVJzy76awD0ZtvdRWbyHS2ooqkMnQauaA
         Jp4tcfdSH8XNP7OTZEBJMMdbUzQ+g7AWQZx4XNGfl4h26+epn/CDEEyJyVg6qGevidQu
         uHcF8WRKScolnXJvo+URgXNY59OJK0UP58xX8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.100.142 with SMTP id y14mr7289886vcn.73.1239668632659; 
	Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0904131700x51671760p70185c2b4e67aac5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5bdc1c8b0904131700x51671760p70185c2b4e67aac5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:23:52 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0add545abeb850ee
Message-ID: <58965d8a0904131723m626d6e61j5bbfd2eab5be0280@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rc-update add hald default or boot?
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d6252c68-376e-455a-aa6d-b342f015769c
X-Archives-Hash: 6852d9b44a5f4a2d147a346280250769

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>   I've wondered for a while whether the design intention of hald was
> to be run at boot time or as a default level process?

I have had mine at "default" forever and it seems to work fine.