From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LrCJ9-00061x-Vu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:29:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13068E0477; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.145]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1CFE0477 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1861895qwc.10 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:29:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=21h8lwoV6oIZMkVlU4BOcDHwIqy5ZaZOhvfsg2c1teQ=; b=DKp1B96q9PT0DZ89/UAubgXurDQrG29z+uC8jYCNFsICekJWYGmUVSh5dwsMEAILiO xv4VJkBi5MpjCa/SfS1OIWqLgVBcfiiCw9ySxGWV1nFHMX/LqKWxO/nPtjljJWMSNbTv 36yl5CALCOrAqNkWvpiyuRz+Gh3MAjfXQwf0c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rBkRtv8/V7O+/E71liY/b22KrPPa89V5blHjTKMZ/eQbtpB5Dy4Q7N36tSJnzYPhy6 L3RvfSQ+Bviz0yTLKoDj1iwYt6WIQ/Sp0Mbq3jUCS955a2WzondXIQFW++T2BPJ0p6mE XVsBrsk/1TD409lDlBi+xPqqnSmy5q88lyROo= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.73.198 with SMTP id r6mr392144vcj.29.1239114586454; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:29:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090407141241.GN6904@syscon4.inet> References: <20090406021307.GG6904@syscon4.inet> <200904062120.22641.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20090406222249.GL6904@syscon4.inet> <200904070912.31325.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <20090407141241.GN6904@syscon4.inet> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:29:46 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 10615f87caf0668c Message-ID: <58965d8a0904070729q6f791e9aua9adc66fbe324515@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild quits at 21% From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: be15c686-e31e-4ce0-9e7e-22d15d8583aa X-Archives-Hash: ba636edfeb6799373f82684934d23fd4 On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Joseph wrote: > On 04/07/09 09:12, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 00:22:49 Joseph wrote: >>> >>> On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote: >>> >> I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package >>> >> that >>> >> did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run "revdep-rebuild" it >>> >> quits at 21% >>> >> Does anybody know how to fix it? >>> >> >>> >> I tried recompiling gentoolkit; did not help. >>> > >>> >Error messages? >>> >Logs? >>> >Console output? >>> > >>> >Your question cannot be answered as all we know is that it "failed". 21% >>> > is also meaningless - that just says revdep-rebuild was doing it's main >>> > thing and stopped. >>> >>> I wish I could provide more information, the cursor just seats there, >>> there >>> is no error messages at the console. Which log " revdep-rebuild" writes >>> to? >>> >>> I'm rebuilding the system with the old CFLAGS so I'll have more >>> information >>> tomorrow. I used -march=native but I think my AMD64 didn't like it :-/ >> >> It's possible that gcc got confused as to what cpu you have an it's >> abilities. If you still don't know what CFLAGS to use, post your >> /proc/cpuinfo here and someone is bound to know what works well. >> > > Here is my cpuinfo; > cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 15 > model : 47 > model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ > stepping : 0 > cpu MHz : 1802.243 > cache size : 512 KB > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 1 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm > 3dnowext 3dnow up rep_good nopl pni > bogomips : 3604.48 > TLB size : 1024 4K pages > clflush size : 64 > cache_alignment : 64 > address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > power management: ts fid vid ttp tm stc > > I'm runing 64-bit so in my case I think it will be Athlon not Sempron: > > Are the setting below correct? > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe" I have the same CPU and i use -march=athlon64 but I think this is equivalent to k8 by reading the GCC docs. So I think it looks good.