From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUUan-0003p5-JQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:22:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB8EE077B; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f13.google.com (mail-gx0-f13.google.com [209.85.217.13]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30699E077B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so2305693gxk.10 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:22:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HWhUZY4AEQkGMBBz1Kn+4gJl4G7A3rom4a+s+gAPM/4=; b=i2404ol6IZxYtH5DtU9RZmYv6R9GNssVh7QEtthf4GRy4UrpJ6GYp0odoQImUGdb6/ FEt7tRxZBtM3cQAecqopFw4wy3iyka4BlNW3EAzQTbR+fIIW6UAHqZKFcHtA4hBlw4Y4 8SQU7ebO+Uas2lI2q15RXg6m8qKwSWkPnTKlQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=mcwDpJZu6o6Fm+ItVxOzSKjjsGoOiy4Nc3szrxFdjwsRfJuVFjW72eWrG6nN8Tbrae NNC6/Gw/YRBX/HrxRPrAUdIWM2rNJNBR0g2+1e1kVKeF4AMXTDnbIHOOPUZC5O8VIO4K Y4i3rXFf1qMUicWmHxKQGrt7BEAZBROO81EVY= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.50.1 with SMTP id x1mr3861727ybx.187.1233703327778; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:22:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4988CF4D.7040503@gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10902031129x4f2adb67w9fbbf1f0867d6cc6@mail.gmail.com> <20090203202359.4022edf8@krikkit> <5bdc1c8b0902031232o4d449aa7j14c68fd4dd7d8c75@mail.gmail.com> <20090203222742.33d93b51@krikkit> <49bf44f10902031451g384274a3v54e8257a3bb84470@mail.gmail.com> <4988CF4D.7040503@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:22:07 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 62aa9da09fa90dbc Message-ID: <58965d8a0902031522m5ceeb84ck54161d8fbf62b226@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 'emerge -avDuN world' doesn't find everything From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0dccc781-b071-4f82-8b62-8ec017cca3cf X-Archives-Hash: c6732e170c941507d6ae8be73fbcaf95 On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Dale wrote: > Grant wrote: >>>> When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why >>>> --with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone >>>> once in awhile. >>>> >>> Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages >>> that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the >>> dependent package is updated, so why waste time rebuilding them in the >>> interim? >>> >>> No one really gets "burned" by this, they just wonder why installed >>> packages aren't upgraded, nothing stops working. >>> >> >> I added: >> >> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps n" >> >> to make.conf and ran 'emerge --depclean' and it got rid of a bunch of >> stuff, but I'm still confused by boost. --depclean didn't remove it, >> 'emerge -avDuN world' doesn't downgrade it even --with-bdeps y, but >> 'emerge -pv boost' would downgrade it. I also re-emerged twinkle and >> rb_libtorrent which are the packages that depend on boost, but the >> result is the same. >> >> Also man seems to be broken after that --depclean. When I try to use >> it, I get errors starting with: >> >> sh: /usr/bin/unlzma: No such file or directory >> >> - Grant >> >> >> > > > This may help. > > root@smoker / # equery belongs /usr/bin/unlzma > [ Searching for file(s) /usr/bin/unlzma in *... ] > app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 (/usr/bin/unlzma -> lzma) > root@smoker / # > > I would rebuild that or see why it is not already installed. I would > think that would be part of system??? I'm not sure tho. I seem to recall some switch from LZMA to BZ2 manpages in an etc-update recently ...