From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUS8g-0001cW-Pe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:44:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6A46E05A1; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f13.google.com (mail-gx0-f13.google.com [209.85.217.13]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7850CE05A1 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so2216727gxk.10 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:44:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uHmp2NkJ5xWVmDKGDqIOEGECME2WU5SvxEIAPO9Zklg=; b=WiHzhnJc/TKwLL7/dpVuQeoeqlCoGxznBG+kY8NYLpFVYZB0Vqd2nM/HB0xTkijazG n7VCaDqEVt6f/6YqodeBmOawSvIA+knCfrgtD7lQAg+PPX4S/yVOt/6L5YQ6QxeNr0V4 f9nG3p/PbrBTk1wZcwsNFD/E/prvLyM6ucK6o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=SrhQWaJRVw3zPH4MHbVYUfY8p+aYZX4+dsJ3Rq8k1nWZ/h8JxISeug9Cusi0MEF4Yr 7nEhT6seXa0nYPFcmx37BFRFKCnb4AHLfha5KMgdJOpLcgBYfIAK6Ihk0udNpzMy715z lz4AHfrVgMYzKe2UtLqV9mJUlCAEdVJYPZau0= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.112.4 with SMTP id p4mr1171236ybm.44.1233693896492; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:44:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0902031232o4d449aa7j14c68fd4dd7d8c75@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10902031129x4f2adb67w9fbbf1f0867d6cc6@mail.gmail.com> <20090203202359.4022edf8@krikkit> <5bdc1c8b0902031232o4d449aa7j14c68fd4dd7d8c75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:44:56 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fecd6cccdb0370d9 Message-ID: <58965d8a0902031244o5f903825p69d2e1f93f24e875@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 'emerge -avDuN world' doesn't find everything From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9c794939-f2f8-45c7-9d38-6b6295dad611 X-Archives-Hash: 002a52cc1ff044a5c4b7c89265918ad9 On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0800, Grant wrote: >> >>> Is portage supposed to pick up on this with 'emerge -avDuN world'? >> >> Not if these are build-time dependencies, in which case they'll only be >> picked up when you use --with-bdeps y. >> >> This is becoming a VFAQ. >> >> >> -- >> Neil Bothwick > > When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why > --with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone > once in awhile. When I asked a similar question, the whole bdeps thing was a red herring. The cause in my case was ebuilds changing without having the version increased. I guess portage uses the tree vs installed ebuild cache depending on what you ask of it. For example when I installed foo it did not have bar as a dep, so --deep doesn't find it. However, the same version of foo that i have installed now includes the dep for bar, so other commands/tools which look at the ebuilds in the tree will see it like that (or re-emerging foo). Maybe that's not how it works (I'm no portage expert, just a average user). Back to the OP's exact problem: It looks like it wants to downgrade boost from 1.35.0-r1 down to 1.34.1. 1.35.0-r2 is testing (~arch) while 1.34.1-2 is stable. Did you override arch when emerging?