From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-85668-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1KvKMV-0001lL-22 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:22:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43A97E02D3; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6B7E02D3 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so246871wff.10 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:21:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=kB7uMjbs2Z3ptjnkHzVooRIwfXaqc8sSB+w3f/DBXG4=; b=gUnKC+FGSpRqNS2c4RuTM65LyDzbISNn0ncJjxhqsRwHGDX5e4BoIJF/Ue6qeW4BpX NSR5EBfDBC2ndiFof059WEM4yRS6yV+QI6Jm5vMAkuxsRCrOSV1gHNI2EOTMUZnwc63l kGOmXhPwQabmHGb+VeKZgaDq8VPGMPxjK68GM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=I8Dc4GWGTFMuSNXQPpNL9DHjZhvcqExzeffvxXEd+S0tN8UWuv8HYAhhuiXJtf5THa DyHXm0mRiBAFlF2DAPtd0Dl7DECnUApDMkNUttPFLZ0WwikHiCUympoCbU0RCtnM7IFa QfotexoJLJvwjKZ0B1/RIksKAvGRVDYEiic8k= Received: by 10.142.81.6 with SMTP id e6mr4291862wfb.31.1225322519489; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.215.4 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58965d8a0810291621r32dd1e31ra9adaf89dc04190e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:21:59 -0500 From: "Paul Hartman" <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A question about emerge --info In-Reply-To: <350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <58965d8a0810291553x50e4068ehc58834dfdbce285b@mail.gmail.com> <350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 432cd672b05205a0 X-Archives-Salt: 479df188-9f0a-400f-b04d-3bfc24be69cf X-Archives-Hash: 629dbc76fe6214ce51d106ef6ce5afc4 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman > <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output: >> >> $ emerge --info >> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2, >> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64) >> ================================================================= >> System uname: >> >> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5 >> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000 >> >> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the >> fifth? >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> > > My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was > running on glibc2.2.5 > > See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain. By toolchain do you mean gcc/binutils? Both have been built since I've had glibc 2.8 installed. When I build my kernel I just "make all" (after configuring, of course). I've never even had glibc2.2.5 on this computer. The earliest was 2.5 and I've been using 2.8 since June. That's why the message confuses me. "uname -a" does not actually mention anything about glibc, but emerge --info is getting it from somewhere. I haven't tried to look into the depths of emerge sources yet to figure out exactly where it's getting that info. Thanks, Paul