From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Interesting portage upgrade
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 08:57:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5722307.lOV4Wx5bFT@wstn> (raw)
Hello list,
This is just an observation.
I update the rescue system on this box weekly. Today, portage version 3.0.18
wanted to upgrade itself to 3.0.20-r6, plus 31 other packages, and remerge 16
others. After saying No and emerging portage, those 16 remerges were not
included: just the 31 upgrades.
This is the first time I've witnessed a real difference in portage's behaviour
between versions, as far as I can remember.
As I said, just an observation.
--
Regards,
Peter.
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-26 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-26 7:57 Peter Humphrey [this message]
2021-07-03 10:49 ` [gentoo-user] Interesting portage upgrade Tamer Higazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5722307.lOV4Wx5bFT@wstn \
--to=peter@prh.myzen.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox