From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7BF138206 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32E6721C071; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out6.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out6.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.106]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A52E07C9 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:34:59 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BfBQBfPSFX/4bEO8teHAGDG71Ahg8CgTVMAQEBAQEBZieEQgEBBA45HhMRCw0LCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIJbZXjCIBKYYhhEuEJ2KFCgWHcYZWP4kKjheBZ4dTF4VAhiSJCgJiggUbgVgviWYBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A2BfBQBfPSFX/4bEO8teHAGDG71Ahg8CgTVMAQEBAQEBZieEQgEBBA45HhMRCw0LCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGIJbZXjCIBKYYhhEuEJ2KFCgWHcYZWP4kKjheBZ4dTF4VAhiSJCgJiggUbgVgviWYBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,543,1454947200"; d="scan'208";a="237027608" Received: from unknown (HELO mail.vm.localdomain) ([203.59.196.134]) by icp-osb-irony-out6.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2016 06:34:57 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.vm.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6360C5663B for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:34:57 +0800 (AWST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localdomain Received: from mail.vm.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.vm.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btwET2B8SINn for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:34:54 +0800 (AWST) Received: from [192.168.44.7] (rattus.lan.localdomain [192.168.44.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wdk) by mail.vm.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B59156637 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:34:54 +0800 (AWST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Failed to emerge dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.6.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <571E5EA7.5020908@gmail.com> <91362879.bZbJghtOxj@peak> <5720BA69.90807@gmail.com> <2215395.nngPdndWYF@serenity> <5720F7F7.8000100@gmail.com> From: Bill Kenworthy X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <57213E8D.3080508@iinet.net.au> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:34:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5720F7F7.8000100@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a22ebd73-438d-4dea-9d44-b442530af5c5 X-Archives-Hash: 21e45cf7ea6d335a4ef2b0d487e83882 On 28/04/16 01:33, Dale wrote: > Michael Mol wrote: >> I have my system automatically update nightly, and check the build results in >> the morning. If there's a persistent build error for a couple days, I file a >> bug report. That's my threshold, anyway. >> > > > This started on Sunday. So it has met that part anyway. Since I run a > mix of stable and unstable, it has been known to cause issues that are > weird. I just don't want to file a bug report and take up a devs time > if it is some weird one off thing that affects no one else. It's not > like they don't have enough stuff to deal with already. Then again, > they do want info on failures so that it doesn't affect others. Where's > my coin to flip? lol > > I plan to sync again and if it persists, Raid comes out. :/ > > Thanks. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > I have a couple of background "things" happening at the moment: prelink and glibc: odd failures that make no sense - unprelink the system and everything works fine (at some point you get a failure to fork.) I hit it when trying to build multiple lxc instances ... it builds two and then the server becomes "toast" :( There is a bug on bgo ... btrfs and kernels 4.4.6 and 4.4.7: fails to convert/balance a raid 10 (system hard lock, no errors) and maybe some file system related build errors (which might also be glibc related, though it might not ...) 4.4.8 works fine (includes a number of btrfs fixes) Either of those fit? BillK