From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B410A59CB2 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D01EC21C1F7; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:44:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7121621C075 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 09:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id a140so16771396wma.2 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 02:44:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eysgKsiksaO0pEI+vyPyJQmtmlbEkMnutONKpx7KSgg=; b=dneho0FuQrGuZZ4CS5TtCUR7a61ZFVWVgtNHr+svDH7wgC1MkuRGVesJ5t+74JtARP FsF2QyVXx725xsgQ8dxSKi4BtfzG0nYfsHxMI5MGP/MXoC2tuVTZ2CckCYPdxOWpFY+K eif56+E+DAL5o/ScyvGxLb9EgPUtouxYi1OQ59DvOHyuYxKTjSSRyBpYqVRxXKykXSVs Wkq56KrYl7etx9Ir3Wf49UdMM5bEOXVGOCucZ0N7huyVdUaWLBzaOdfuL2SxM/VGa7g2 AX1nsYr3UpfJWTN1LW4oHEPWUSln4nFGLLaZdfp8FEmo0szIertButS3Q2Vv7RjkEJxo 8PSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eysgKsiksaO0pEI+vyPyJQmtmlbEkMnutONKpx7KSgg=; b=dwCKTAKXvDjU36UD42752Rm9bzrWoYt6fKRF7NF3n4FSwyXetalvSODpVXjg/CW+UV EIVBujoipV1gNP2tnI/QMxEft0Ay5MexByJvAleMRKs3F5NQ+V3Maj3CNZtv4aueHGzK b36lJL1OEfkKf8WigM7gapiUtJdQWowJFBQd5G2fRTQ8Rta+77J3J/KK+cHfnjWPUn3D KATIB6DtMRoXfMQj0w3INPYH1r+Ivl2VzRD8GDWM5PIU9yd/L9r37FeVi+oOW0Zj4+fV c3kEadYPO0sdsw7JZmZ33LGZMgms6X+gnBvLvKMZFxoxZofMISXWEDMLlDDKefpT4Hny vg5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVP89FhYfJNlkSUaGdeUBSLpTgo8JaT7zTGRd7Fr7hwpCGGXzACypQWKCJohQ/+Pw== X-Received: by 10.194.178.233 with SMTP id db9mr30209423wjc.11.1460886295062; Sun, 17 Apr 2016 02:44:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([165.255.116.236]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id iv1sm2480660wjb.34.2016.04.17.02.44.53 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Apr 2016 02:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] And thus the emerge spake... To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20160417034515.GA4948@solfire> <571350A2.4020200@gmail.com> <20160417093654.GF4948@solfire> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: <57135B12.5040802@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:44:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160417093654.GF4948@solfire> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 840f49bf-5e7d-43f7-8a37-ff463d492ec1 X-Archives-Hash: b83d35e05981be6fe34445f925c7ab2f On 17/04/2016 11:36, Meino.Cramer@gmx.de wrote: > Alan McKinnon [16-04-17 11:08]: >> On 17/04/2016 05:45, Meino.Cramer@gmx.de wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> ...and the novice was buffled and even the master shifted a little bit >>> after recognizing this words of the eternal being named emerge. >>> I know, that there is a difference in knowing the path and walking the >>> path, but it seems that I am not supposed to understand this: >>> >>> >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: >>> >>> Calculating dependencies... done! >>> >>> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 KiB >>> >>> WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: >>> >>> dev-util/boost-build:0 >>> >>> (dev-util/boost-build-1.60.0:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with >>> =dev-util/boost-build-1.58* required by (dev-libs/boost-1.58.0-r1:0/1.58.0::gentoo, installed) >>> ^ ^^^^^ >>> >>> >>> !!! The following update has been skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies: >>> >>> dev-libs/boost:0 >>> >>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=dev-util/boost-build-1.60*" have been masked. >>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: >>> - dev-util/boost-build-1.60.0::gentoo (masked by: ) >>> >>> >>> For me it looks like boost not beeing updated/reinstalled because of >>> another version of boost, which depends on boost. >>> >>> HELP, I need somebody, HELP, not just anybody hee-eee-eelp uuuuuhhhh! >>> >>> Thanks for any HELP in advance! May the source be with you... >>> Best regards, >>> Meino >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> Hah! That's one of those blockers that makes little or no sense. >> >> >> boost has this dep: >> >> DEPEND="${RDEPEND} >> =dev-util/boost-build-${MAJOR_V}*" >> >> and boost-build does not depend on boost. >> >> So, logically you'd expect boost to want to upgrade to 1.60, notice >> boost-build's dep and upgrade boost-build as well to match. But it >> doesn't, because boost-build-1.60 is masked for reason. >> >> It really looks and smells like a bug in emerge[1] when updating world >> where it considers boost-build first, fixes the version to use to match >> current boost, and then can't find a way to upgrade boost. >> >> Solution would seem to be to emerge -C either of them and let portage >> get on with it. Or upgrade just upgrade boost-build by itself then do world >> >> >> [1] I wouldn't go so far as to call it a "bug" as such, because nothing >> in the spec requires a package manager to guarantee that it will always >> find the best way to upgrade everything. It only needs to keep the >> system consistent with the ebuilds it has. >> >> -- >> Alan McKinnon >> alan.mckinnon@gmail.com >> >> > > Hi Alan, > > thanks for your reply! :) > > ...and I thought it was me being too limited to see the real truth > behind that what it is The Matrix. > > But it was only a deja-vu....oh wait! It was NO deja-vu ... no > glitch in The Matrix...we had similiar emerge-ncies in the past. ;) > > I will see how far I can go...I was warned to use 060 of boost... > > Best regards, > Meino > > > It reminds me of many years back with two packages that depend on each other and portage couldn't deal with updating both at the same time. emerge -C got a lot of use back then :-) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com