From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A29D59CB1 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6D7F21C0B5; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com (mail-wm0-f65.google.com [74.125.82.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B53521C06C for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id n3so8571194wmn.1 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nl/vtcjVaf861/ljf1elX91kDBnJPs0JJ4vQ6P6ok1Y=; b=BkyzM4rXlgkF05PcBY6G0zRw3sizT+jwaAVXUuPQO5RxwHJaRoEGZ9Rm+J+ank1B5o PmN56cHyWw9ycG7lr/AbIthQyw3u5XGpAhOJmu39KjSmg5rhtiW57h58fcOd2H97MdD1 2sumkYNZkFYiYJRteeuhGjRjBGTPqgdVSy5eLFehkVjnFalaz/RPHCbBXqeiAvfMPVlp iJA4Yem+/LgVNHIIWkOFLUIXP2VKZ3MjfAd/FXfpKC64iiU7hST9ElC6RvScaArHtvNR tknWh4Nmuo2YzjgF8388AZdUeBL3sAAkmylEkbZfBwfcx6TIWlJIWIhKkohEXOTu/TNz hT0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nl/vtcjVaf861/ljf1elX91kDBnJPs0JJ4vQ6P6ok1Y=; b=mwHA9S8TbzF/miC+F8/gNRM4dqunjEMJixoFT1jO5DvcSCCVxiv12QkhaSotflvsvX 2syd+iOupCmv7RRFfdB1qbSr9P8OlAYOvyAUnhL+l8XDv8YsfkkgrvDqWQlHcvQJcBLs zx3FEvUdMxqUqeRkbLvOgBJkVRhuwse8gQnGW3/cVLYPkXcEVKw6Fxzo4yhHSUCkfp2E FY2zQzy3Jxcxw8m2NMAvVjTh0bC/7yZddrXT2Q0ix+lQdH6KLxNKzqJ+MxwbmN+eeozh OIj2b06Jj+3Y7LmOaSelbTMPFvXOOR6gzOdkd3xB0XlG+gJ27M86nbLFZei2LQsKR2yL ydgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXALF5R3AB9rZBHEM4ZjN7BGIvHpTixZLywaNvT1E6wpYxie9YIXU+bgJYHDZD+iw== X-Received: by 10.28.232.140 with SMTP id f12mr6471880wmi.6.1460493811130; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.40] ([165.255.112.141]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cb2sm35158749wjc.16.2016.04.12.13.43.29 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE and the new plasma 5 thing To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <570C89C0.3060807@gmail.com> <20160412210116.3f26f3ed@digimed.co.uk> <570D582A.5000209@gmail.com> <4020761.IeERuz4cc2@andromeda> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: <570D5DEE.7070607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4020761.IeERuz4cc2@andromeda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9e0e9bda-b60b-4ae7-a073-ada0d74a7bd4 X-Archives-Hash: 6f3bb6c82d1cbb3343d2288dee0d8d8d On 12/04/2016 22:31, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:18:50 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 12/04/2016 22:01, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:31:28 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: >>>>> I have ksnapshot in @world, so depclean didn't touch it. It >>>>> still works fine. Spectacle and ksnapshot block each other, but if >>>>> you unmerge spectacle you may be able to get a working ksnapshot >>>>> back, at least for now. >>>> >>>> I know, had to copy a meta-ebuild ( kdegraphics-meta ) into my local >>>> overlay and modify it to pick ksnapshot though. As the later version >>>> only allows Spectacle. >>> >>> I don't use the meta packages, preferring to define my own set with the >>> packages I want, so I wasn't aware of Spectacle. I've just tried it an is >>> seems to do much the same as ksnapshot, just with a lot more white space >>> in the UI - but WTF do they block one another, they're only screen shot >>> programs? >> >> There doesn't seem to be a good technical reason, maybe it's as simple >> as the maintainer thought there shouldn't be two competing apps with the >> same functionality? >> >> I unblocked them here, and re-emerged both. Nothing extra was pulled in, >> so there are no conflicting libs. >> >> Unfortunately I can't attach a screenshot as proof - both remove their >> own window to do the capture :-) > > Find a 3rd one to do it with. > Or take a picture with a mobile phone? :) I considered that, then I remembered that I'm a lazy sod, so I didn't! -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com