From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-169131-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633961384B4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:16:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23E9C21C153;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:16:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from oc.oops.co.at (oc.oops.co.at [85.90.244.114])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDAC21C016
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:16:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504F88384
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:16:15 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oc.oops.co.at
Received: from oc.oops.co.at ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (oc.oops.co.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id Zbvvl3doRRwQ for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:16:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:5265:f3ff:fe1f:a652] (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:5265:f3ff:fe1f:a652])
	by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C04E8836D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:16:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout;
	t=1451513766; bh=HB3NxD8cNDhBRPJvH7m7A0QyemqZ8Kx6sh1aPrplyYc=;
	h=Reply-To:Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=XU/7O9pVRbzV4ySU7HVl/ERxEsDNSo4DNrrp5qffPuKU1Ijzl0OqlHIU0gC+XTBFK
	 UJIsQYIUqip2w0g661psgoYSdSjVLnpu4XleeD7MGgQf2L/o99iR+LEEqr6xdvg8iH
	 qd5rfbNJg2ucgJXhTUb9ykbYiB5S2HZgSxSKELaw=
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?
References: <565F6CF4.9010403@xunil.at> <56689182.2030001@xunil.at>
 <5668922B.1030401@gmail.com> <56689C1E.4000808@xunil.at>
 <5668A1DB.9060007@gmail.com> <5668A52B.7040700@xunil.at>
 <20151210045004.GA2289@waltdnes.org> <56691FDB.70104@xunil.at>
 <20151210185249.GA3908@waltdnes.org> <566A9875.8090807@xunil.at>
 <566D4AEC.9040008@xunil.at> <566D5B74.7060202@xunil.at>
 <566D5EFD.80509@xunil.at> <56701D6B.3030607@xunil.at>
 <568429DA.2030300@xunil.at>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: oops!
Message-ID: <568457A5.5080605@xunil.at>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 23:16:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <568429DA.2030300@xunil.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c3afa126-5e13-46da-a9fd-72a3cb30a1fb
X-Archives-Hash: 1fdbbcbea1f2a8c9354849a12a04defb

On 12/30/2015 08:00 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:

> Would using gcc-5.x make a noticeable difference?

Well, while you all are preparing to reply ...

;-)

... I simply went for it.

unmasked gcc-5.3.0, compiled it, and then recompiled @system and the
kernel ("make localmodconfig" to be curious) with it.

Booted it, snappy, fine!

right now gcc rebuilds itself, some more packages to re-emerge, load at
around 7.5, system usable, audio stream without a hickup.