From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1F61384B4 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6129C21C008; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f174.google.com (mail-yk0-f174.google.com [209.85.160.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22984E08A1 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 21:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x184so96521462yka.3 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:21:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=momPcI+ucZVoUc+H5690WI6IMRyA197CpSMJxo1Gin4=; b=S/W7Qks0VKx0KgnflkwB4FV9OCozeO/XhTHkHleQFsVPH4/rvbnL9XZp5y+pb7mYLf uQwwFyI311p7nzfkaVSXHW58I+1Z130qHY/UHGtsU31wcFspTP4k78s1OSTvegSCYVEb JBrLHG0lEHjHZadwj9bjstdth/Driykg1oic0w3hYqNx6A4nay2T9Qnzmkk6OKnK6ceY 6HRfcP4QCdipuDwCENq2BYl2mAKEJ7zOCegHZMy2qSBTj+puZD+eWFYoqqcQRPe6cSHJ Oyd35pe9Gwz8I8tObDz524lZ+GHn2ICFCBbR4wyTOX8FruMHctNRQ1HV7pND0fwPa2C8 dy8w== X-Received: by 10.13.240.66 with SMTP id z63mr9607167ywe.171.1450560060436; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:21:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-107-130.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.107.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g73sm23156780ywb.1.2015.12.19.13.20.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:20:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <3fae32ac-591d-4381-ae7f-bd6802870308@email.android.com> <5675C7C7.2010906@sys-concept.com> From: Dale Message-ID: <5675CA3A.70308@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:20:58 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5675C7C7.2010906@sys-concept.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: be06389a-2f0b-4855-932f-f3797964692c X-Archives-Hash: 0a9e6b7c41445be9d867887e9b68f02b thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 12/19/2015 02:04 PM, John Runyon wrote: >> Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner. >> >> John Runyon >> Sent from my phone >> >> On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >>> [snip] >>> >>>>> It seems I'm not the only one: >>>>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html >>>>> >>>>> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the >>>>> problem went away." >>>>> >>>>> Now, I can not downgrade without eth0 working. >>>>> Do I need to boot strap and downgrade or is there is easier solution? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thelma >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Here is a news item that explains the situation. >>>> >>>> 2015-10-07-openrc-0-18-localmount-and-netmount-changes >>>> Title OpenRC-0.18 localmount and netmount changes >>>> Author William Hubbs >>>> Posted 2015-10-07 >>>> Revision 1 >>>> >>>> The behaviour of localmount and netmount is changing on Linux systems. >>>> In the past, these services always started successfully. However, now they >>>> will fail if a file system they attempt to mount cannot be mounted. >>>> >>>> If you have file systems listed in fstab which should not be mounted at >>>> boot time, make sure to add noauto to the mount options. If you have >>>> file systems that you want to attempt to mount at boot time but failure >>>> should be allowed, add nofail to the mount options for these file >>>> systems in fstab. >>>> >>> This is my fstab: >>> /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 1 >>> /dev/hda3 / ext3 noatime 0 1 >>> /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0 >>> /dev/hda4 /home ext3 noatime 0 1 >>> >>> /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro,users 0 0 >>> /dev/hdd /mnt/dvdr auto noauto,users 0 0 >>> >>> # Scanner >>> none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 >>> >>> none /proc proc defaults 0 0 >>> >>> Does it mean I should add: "nofail" to Scanner and "/proc" line? > OK, I've added "nofail" to Scanner, and still no network after boot. > > -- > Thelma > > I'd try adding nofail to all except / and /home. Then remove one at a time until it fails again and that should be the one that is messing with you. Dale :-) :-)