Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

[thelma@sys-concept.com]

On 12/19/2015 02:04 PM, John Runyon wrote:
> Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner.
> 
> John Runyon
> Sent from my phone
> 
> On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, thelma@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>> On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: 
>> [snip] 
>>
>>>>>
>>>> It seems I'm not the only one: 
>>>> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html 
>>>>
>>>> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the 
>>>> problem went away." 
>>>>
>>>> Now, I can not downgrade without eth0 working. 
>>>> Do I need to boot strap and downgrade or is there is easier solution? 
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thelma 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Here is a news item that explains the situation. 
>>>
>>> 2015-10-07-openrc-0-18-localmount-and-netmount-changes 
>>>    Title                     OpenRC-0.18 localmount and netmount changes 
>>>    Author                    William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> 
>>>    Posted                    2015-10-07 
>>>    Revision                  1 
>>>
>>> The behaviour of localmount and netmount is changing on Linux systems. 
>>> In the past, these services always started successfully. However, now they 
>>> will fail if a file system they attempt to mount cannot be mounted. 
>>>
>>> If you have file systems listed in fstab which should not be mounted at 
>>> boot time, make sure to add noauto to the mount options. If you have 
>>> file systems that you want to attempt to mount at boot time but failure 
>>> should be allowed, add nofail to the mount options for these file 
>>> systems in fstab. 
>>>
>>
>> This is my fstab: 
>> /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 1 
>> /dev/hda3 / ext3 noatime 0 1 
>> /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0 
>> /dev/hda4 /home ext3 noatime   0 1 
>>
>> /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro,users 0 0 
>> /dev/hdd                /mnt/dvdr       auto         noauto,users            0 0 
>>
>> # Scanner 
>> none   /proc/bus/usb   usbfs           defaults,devmode=0666   0 0 
>>
>> none /proc proc defaults 0 0 
>>
>> Does it mean I should add: "nofail" to Scanner and "/proc" line? 

OK, I've added "nofail" to Scanner, and still no network after boot.

--
Thelma