From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5DA1384B4 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8953421C062; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail142c7.megamailservers.com (mail142c7.megamailservers.com [69.49.98.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D30D21C005 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 20:59:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: info.sys-concept.com Received: from [10.0.0.100] ([184.69.242.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail142c7.megamailservers.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id tBJKxMwQ018317 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 15:59:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <5675ABC2.3030007@sys-concept.com> <5675AEE7.8030606@sys-concept.com> From: thelma@sys-concept.com X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5675C53A.1070909@sys-concept.com> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:59:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.5675C52D.0112,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=XqHDZz19 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:117 a=u3gW5Uk2xAGXuEgp5FffjQ==:17 a=BDKbP5mgAAAA:8 a=046jbqsEAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=tF6p8oU0Qx-DPJHsn_QA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=I9Xmcz9iofMA:10 X-Archives-Salt: c1c91921-a6e7-4b88-bd27-87989c9017db X-Archives-Hash: 959d7e8560e05ed04d69ef1f37968fd5 On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: [snip] >>> >> It seems I'm not the only one: >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html >> >> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the >> problem went away." >> >> Now, I can not downgrade without eth0 working. >> Do I need to boot strap and downgrade or is there is easier solution? >> >> -- >> Thelma >> >> >> > Here is a news item that explains the situation. > > 2015-10-07-openrc-0-18-localmount-and-netmount-changes > Title OpenRC-0.18 localmount and netmount changes > Author William Hubbs > Posted 2015-10-07 > Revision 1 > > The behaviour of localmount and netmount is changing on Linux systems. > In the past, these services always started successfully. However, now they > will fail if a file system they attempt to mount cannot be mounted. > > If you have file systems listed in fstab which should not be mounted at > boot time, make sure to add noauto to the mount options. If you have > file systems that you want to attempt to mount at boot time but failure > should be allowed, add nofail to the mount options for these file > systems in fstab. > This is my fstab: /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 noauto,noatime 1 1 /dev/hda3 / ext3 noatime 0 1 /dev/hda2 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/hda4 /home ext3 noatime 0 1 /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom auto noauto,ro,users 0 0 /dev/hdd /mnt/dvdr auto noauto,users 0 0 # Scanner none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 Does it mean I should add: "nofail" to Scanner and "/proc" line? -- Thelma