From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C6B1384B4 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A96421C00E; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com (mail-oi0-f45.google.com [209.85.218.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 783C021C003 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oies6 with SMTP id s6so80792658oie.1 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:51:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XFxcJLmbYWuFoeHkaATsgRhCVEtglxjtEIFwwlQO5E4=; b=dJanvyOOTLJKiULYcBTwgP6glzG5cT/upqTMxFeZGrjigRMLyYEFOClyrYgHZg9jBW SPXGis2mr1yNxOH91pwDGnqYxIq0sWSNwEdCYD9OCKKoGlFifceM1rpEjgdPfANdoX7G zTsUXHFIpES01259aTbYCOoTIV1ZAlQR24ybxtvNvLhuHHqD27U+O9xwzIBMKavsmINX Gq7DHk/dZcrXif4+WZg5UoBNlrLhmOR1FasldMCSe4x6zxQhqNh3S46yAAK7DFJmZq5Y GPVj2PPvBVT295MAhvKXg9pRt2UvblEVhd6p+o5EYqFWtgWTG0/GXXoDP/jKzTn3qr4g k5dQ== X-Received: by 10.202.72.132 with SMTP id v126mr14135069oia.84.1447663895577; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:51:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-116-226.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.116.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 130sm11589330oid.21.2015.11.16.00.51.34 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:51:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: All sorts of digest verification failures To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <20151112171903.68e1b944@hal9000.localdomain> <5644C238.6040008@gmail.com> <20151115095928.GA1766@acm.fritz.box> <20151115171735.4fd31dc3@digimed.co.uk> <5648E8C3.5090509@gmail.com> From: Dale X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56499915.1010800@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 02:51:33 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: dfa2419e-5b08-457a-b0a9-615bb6c07d55 X-Archives-Hash: 84ae18d4d42c779801fbf4cb1080a6d4 Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-11-15, Dale wrote: > >> Wasn't there a emerge option to ignore the manifest? I seem to recall= >> there used to be one but it was a LONG time ago. Of course, if someon= e >> has tinkered with something that would be a bad thing to do. > If the digest failures are for packages you don't have installed, just > removing the entire directory for each of the broken manifests is one > temporary work-around. > Thing is, one of the ones that fails is a package that I have installed. That would be busybox and I think that is likely on everyone's system so this would affect every Gentoo system out there. I think I read on -dev somewhere a while back that busybox ended up being pulled in as part of the @system profile/set.=20 Anyway, I figure they will have a fix before to long. I just find it hard to believe that with all the planning that was put into this, the changelogs and these issues were missed. It's not like they decided to change this over a short time frame. They been working on this for ages. Live and learn I guess. ;-) Dale :-) :-)=20