From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E99A1399E0 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1D571431C; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771A414217 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so31089881wic.0 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:31:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nInRJqIcNuIvdcRIN4RHChGcGecfqlQLhrxdfya9YnI=; b=Ceo2tx55MQBnmDLdQLuEl8Kk5hV+KD56JdjIRuYY7eP31DUyeQIqV7LeDf06DeJccq dRwjypVe0jbcxUw1znHUv+s01E/6T/EC3xaAgMoEnY0C2SRrWXL3f2Bghjkpr+6aCb5V HyT2W7NRnKQYym7Vk+4FYM/tccOrT5KE0h0Q1QoeErqoG9q19+vYU15LSQP7XSGelNFS y5VUEqRXdjWVETuH1ykI307RaZ+vxl1UV7GW+5jcfGno3uo1nLsiUNCuONFtxrRnKnIr 8/+y3c1Z3DjNCBgVZLkZOw1LGlCXdpxtmTsZ7ITQK6BBmMuGRGThpcuKkDJJfOn1RwUA V6Qg== X-Received: by 10.194.238.202 with SMTP id vm10mr37088014wjc.96.1441225890271; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.40] (105-237-150-165.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.237.150.165]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id lk16sm5324411wic.6.2015.09.02.13.31.28 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] audacity-2.0.5 failed to compile To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <55E620F2.5010703@sys-concept.com> <55E62F25.3020008@sys-concept.com> <20150902012244.GA2308@greenbeast> <201509022052.22408.dilfridge@gentoo.org> From: Alan McKinnon X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55E75C96.9020708@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:31:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201509022052.22408.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d24589c1-d18a-4506-8c49-476753c4f6e3 X-Archives-Hash: bc4d9711622488683969123f937c49ee On 02/09/2015 20:52, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > On Wednesday 02 September 2015 03:22:44 Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > >>> This kind of language does not belong here. If you can not refrain >>> yourself making sarcastic remarks don't make any comments. > >> This language occasionally belongs on this list. > > > No. > > I would like to respectfully point you to the Gentoo Code of Conduct: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct > > I hear you, but there's also a grand unwritten gentoo-user tradition of using the good old clue-by-four (or a LART) when warranted. We find the same on -dev The vast majority of the audience here are very knowledgeable and comfortable in their skin. Speakers often speak their mind, listeners often listen, offence is seldom taken. The web forum OTOH, is very different. There I would agree with patrolling for code of conduct violations. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com