From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC121383D3 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54A8814298; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC1614235 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicjd9 with SMTP id jd9so28347454wic.1 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=veowZDutYNnqhj3aHfpeSythrb22wbfkziR6JRFx5cI=; b=eFqaY9HVU6Unw4G85JrxfBRQxztZBj+K6jFxsEgfMVZEtI73OTVyeWSv9+JxS8um4q RN2CBJ8lQk7p6okhlqVSu/8FGJvRzAeWwHrPozFxXm61iUUeNoyerk0P8i5K7iPzAnrS R7WHh/ZkJgdG1VTzhmWPD8hIKXI8w2JV24oDjTYL3Np0vJiimQ14BwVrnXaxAFtNFl+H LunnNlpX1RH0/G5Z/EMbUPieyKFJVhDJpPldxa1kPdZU84uX5/SETNB85sfhlAulyCFS l5vZle69ypM5GD5/V/XMmbDN9G4p2dx783RSRqE6leCaMN1/X0TsBmnLbHDjbcvfutlF Pbzg== X-Received: by 10.181.13.166 with SMTP id ez6mr2681656wid.24.1441104387753; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (105-237-150-165.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.237.150.165]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ir5sm26555289wjb.23.2015.09.01.03.46.26 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Sep 2015 03:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] a few blockers I can't figure out To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <14864.1440994748@ccs.covici.com> <16396.1441066373@ccs.covici.com> <55E57600.8050409@gmail.com> <2123861.xFrZLEJH4F@thetick> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: <55E581F8.3020804@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:46:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2123861.xFrZLEJH4F@thetick> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6d3c727a-b107-4014-a07d-b21e958023af X-Archives-Hash: 6c08320be30aac2899c928e805f42332 On 01/09/2015 12:18, Marc Joliet_1 wrote: > On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:55:12 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 01/09/2015 02:12, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > [...] >> >> Got it, finally :-) >> >> fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the >> highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later versions do >> not have the flag at all. >> >> Your choices are either to have fail2ban fixed to deal with recent >> systemd USE, and tolerate the systemd downgrade meanwhile; or to replace >> fail2ban with something equivalent > > That'll be because the systemd python bindings were split into a separate > package upstream. But fail2ban already depends on it: > > systemd? ( $(python_gen_cond_dep '|| ( > dev-python/python-systemd[${PYTHON_USEDEP}] > sys-apps/systemd[python(-),${PYTHON_USEDEP}] > )' 'python*' ) ) > > So maybe the OP just needs to unmask python-systemd? That makes sense. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com