From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5A61384C1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F143142B3; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C8431426D for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiclp12 with SMTP id lp12so12212680wic.1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fPCTSuozl8bA3Mr2R0U2eiqM4ChnAsCkix2H+0rh1Zo=; b=u2YD+8YFxyhfrZCn1Q7dpsMHDhwBOYfL/2ccgM8CsZQAUjKVHN/qu9vIV5wIVNj74d PAI63SoLWcdfRR38mkSySAtnOtEHsMVRVNf5PhiB6Kcvgmwn03g4CKb7BJiUBBeWdUl8 GqvcAkKvSnh+yaSA+p7zFCkB7vbbcL3MKIrpKLvyxl7lv7AfzRORYVeuaka2iriUdfou 4l7ZIYX7bPLkwagpd9O5iVuIK3kY/myOPuizjw20LL7pq/VtNFAJcC3XIk+8JsexzkuV fij/avXjao+1pUfAi0KDdeKtzbA8929OmifecKHV4Y2FyEb3npdoemcwB60bRc0VleCN iyUg== X-Received: by 10.194.78.230 with SMTP id e6mr30037122wjx.43.1441059503040; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (105-237-150-165.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.237.150.165]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id mc18sm701800wic.23.2015.08.31.15.18.21 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] a few blockers I can't figure out To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <14864.1440994748@ccs.covici.com> <55E42037.1060402@gmail.com> <32639.1441018993@ccs.covici.com> <55E43610.7000709@gmail.com> <24901.1441021764@ccs.covici.com> <55E44B22.9090806@gmail.com> <29989.1441029822@ccs.covici.com> <55E46A64.5030701@gmail.com> <5230.1441040087@ccs.covici.com> From: Alan McKinnon Message-ID: <55E4D2A2.5050500@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 00:18:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5230.1441040087@ccs.covici.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ef1d665c-6a6f-42a5-a55f-823a3f206fbf X-Archives-Hash: 383ae96fc177b31565e0515e470fb6f9 On 31/08/2015 18:54, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: >> The words make sense, the meaning doesn't :-) >> > >> > It looks like fail2ban wants systemd without python support, but the >> > true reason is still hidden. The fail2ban ebuild has this: >> > >> > RDEPEND=" >> > ... >> > systemd? ( $(python_gen_cond_dep '|| ( >> > dev-python/python-systemd[${PYTHON_USEDEP}] >> > sys-apps/systemd[python(-),${PYTHON_USEDEP}] >> > >> > >> > I'm thinking maybe you have a specific portage entry that's getting in >> > the way. What are your results for: >> > >> > emerge --info >> > grep -r python /etc/portage >> > grep -r systemd /etc/portage > Just to let you know, most of the python entries were mandated by > portage, certainly the systemd one. I'm having a hard time figuring out what is making portage do this. I also figure you're OK with a downgraded systemd meanwhile, but just for kicks, lets test my theory: If you run this, does portage offer to upgrade systemd? USE="-python" emerge -pv systemd -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com