From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-166718-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0364213989A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:06:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A37251423C;
	Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.wraeth.id.au (wraeth.id.au [106.187.101.125])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B1E08C8
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.10.4] (unknown [103.6.189.243])
	by mail.wraeth.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88DCD1F494
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 09:06:21 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [gentoo-user] about updating gcc & wiki pages
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
References: <877fohxj4w.fsf@reader.local.lan>
From: wraeth <wraeth@wraeth.id.au>
Message-ID: <55DED2F6.5090809@wraeth.id.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:05:58 +1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <877fohxj4w.fsf@reader.local.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: fd653db4-1147-4e6f-87b1-85de09d621d5
X-Archives-Hash: f46538a9e4844125cee86cce75cb9928

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 27/08/15 17:53, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can anyone offer an informed opinion as to whether the wiki pages 
> at: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Upgrading_GCC
> 
> Are current and apply as well to the newest gcc versions?

You may not have noticed but at the bottom of each wiki page there is
a timestamp:

"This page was last modified on 11 August 2015, at 20:29."

While I don't take this as a verification of correctness, I usually do
consider it an indication of not-completely-wrongness.

- -- 
wraeth <wraeth@wraeth.id.au>
GnuPG Key: B2D9F759
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlXe0vIACgkQXcRKerLZ91mVBQD+LY2m0Zs2vZdzt/ZzbWAyaQa4
Q8nuCJuGAJovLcLGnAAA/06YQHcK+OcFWPIFwpSFRpA94Vw3opzuotH6/7+i3gES
=lf3B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----