* [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P @ 2015-08-22 19:19 Alan Grimes 2015-08-22 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alan Grimes @ 2015-08-22 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1129 bytes --] Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the chassis. You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's regulators. I would call this PSU marginal, it absolutely does power the machine but it's noise output is a bit larger than what I would prefer. Given that i'm flat on my ass broke with a foreclosure over my head, I am powerfully inclined to continue to live with the PSU the way it is now until it is no longer possible to do so. I had to use my windows 7 machine to get the photo off my camera because digikam does not compile. =| -- IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. Powers are not rights. [-- Attachment #2: IMG_0012.JPG --] [-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 394567 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-22 19:19 [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P Alan Grimes @ 2015-08-22 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 0:11 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-25 21:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick 2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2015-08-22 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 22/08/2015 21:19, Alan Grimes wrote: > Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? I've seen cleaner. And dirtier. > The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off > was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the > chassis. > > You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The > waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but > sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- > 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around > 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This > __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's regulators. > > I would call this PSU marginal, it absolutely does power the machine but > it's noise output is a bit larger than what I would prefer. I would call that PSU on it's last legs, and highly likely to be the root cause for the recent difficulties you've posted about and possibly more too. +100mV/-200mV is excessive > Given that i'm flat on my ass broke with a foreclosure over my head, I > am powerfully inclined to continue to live with the PSU the way it is > now until it is no longer possible to do so. Well now you put it that way, you don't have many options other than use what you've got. But do realise that the next time you run into some weird issue, that PSU is most likely what you are dealing with as root cause. > I had to use my windows 7 machine to get the photo off my camera because > digikam does not compile. =| -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-22 19:19 [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P Alan Grimes 2015-08-22 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2015-08-23 0:11 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-23 11:14 ` Mick 2015-08-25 21:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-23 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Saturday, August 22, 2015 3:19:50 PM Alan Grimes wrote: > Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? > > The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off > was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the > chassis. > > You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The > waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but > sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- > 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around > 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This > __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's regulators. Regulators don't filter noise, they introduce it. Capacitors do that as somebody pointed on the other thread. So if you're on a tight budget and you have an electronics surplus store nearby you can replace all the capacitors on your mobo and PSU (except the big bulky ones on the PSU) for about $3. > I would call this PSU marginal, it absolutely does power the machine but > it's noise output is a bit larger than what I would prefer. > > Given that i'm flat on my ass broke with a foreclosure over my head, I > am powerfully inclined to continue to live with the PSU the way it is > now until it is no longer possible to do so. > > I had to use my windows 7 machine to get the photo off my camera because > digikam does not compile. =| > > -- Fernando Rodriguez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 0:11 ` Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-23 11:14 ` Mick 2015-08-23 11:46 ` Dale 2015-08-23 20:24 ` Fernando Rodriguez 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mick @ 2015-08-23 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2583 bytes --] On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 01:11:03 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Saturday, August 22, 2015 3:19:50 PM Alan Grimes wrote: > > Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? > > > > The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off > > was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the > > chassis. > > > > You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The > > waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but > > sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- > > 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around > > 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This > > __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's > > regulators. > > Regulators don't filter noise, they introduce it. Capacitors do that as > somebody pointed on the other thread. > > So if you're on a tight budget and you have an electronics surplus store > nearby you can replace all the capacitors on your mobo and PSU (except the > big bulky ones on the PSU) for about $3. It is quite likely that only the secondary circuit on the PSU needs to have its electrolytic capacitors replaced. We're talking of anything between one to half a dozen of capacitors. In all likelihood less than a $1 to $3. If any are even slightly domed I'd start with those and spend no more than a few cents. Primary circuit ceramic capacitors (transient protection) could have been affected if the PSU was submitted to high surges in the mains supply. I had one go bad on me after sheet lightning hit the area once. Its replacement along with a resistor fixed the PSU without any further problems and to much of my surprise - I thought it was a gonner! Domed capacitors on the MoBo is a different story. Quite likely other components would have been affected and many of them are surface mounted. You'll need a magnifying glass and steady hands for those. It is not something I would attempt in haste, as it is easy to damage more components than what you fix on a MoBo. YMMV. PS. Noisy PSUs are nothing new. The noise is can be caused by the capacitors, or the coils. Although annoying it does not necessarily mean that there is an electrical problem with the components. If the fan is rattling, then a drop of oil on its bearing should soon put a stop to this. As Dale mentioned, a stalled fan will not help the longevity of the remaining components. :-) -- Regards, Mick [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 11:14 ` Mick @ 2015-08-23 11:46 ` Dale 2015-08-23 20:24 ` Fernando Rodriguez 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Dale @ 2015-08-23 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user Mick wrote: > PS. Noisy PSUs are nothing new. The noise is can be caused by the > capacitors, or the coils. Although annoying it does not necessarily > mean that there is an electrical problem with the components. If the > fan is rattling, then a drop of oil on its bearing should soon put a > stop to this. As Dale mentioned, a stalled fan will not help the > longevity of the remaining components. :-) This is true, they do sometimes make noise. What got my attention is that it stopped. Usually if one makes noise, it will make it for the remainder of its life cycle unless something changes, such has adding additional load which may change a frequency. If nothing changes and it stops making that noise, then it likely stopped working as well. I've seen capacitors go bad and it not blow anything else out or stop the rest of the circuit from working. It all depends on how it is used in the circuit. Most likely in a case like this, if the capacitor just went open circuit, the rest of the circuit will continue to work but the capacitor is no longer doing its job of filtering out the noise and ripple. Still, the mention that it stopped is what got my attention. That doesn't sound good, pardon the pun. ;-) Dale :-) :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 11:14 ` Mick 2015-08-23 11:46 ` Dale @ 2015-08-23 20:24 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-23 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-23 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sunday, August 23, 2015 12:14:58 PM Mick wrote: > On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 01:11:03 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > > On Saturday, August 22, 2015 3:19:50 PM Alan Grimes wrote: > > > Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? > > > > > > The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off > > > was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the > > > chassis. > > > > > > You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The > > > waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but > > > sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- > > > 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around > > > 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This > > > __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's > > > regulators. > > > > Regulators don't filter noise, they introduce it. Capacitors do that as > > somebody pointed on the other thread. > > > > So if you're on a tight budget and you have an electronics surplus store > > nearby you can replace all the capacitors on your mobo and PSU (except the > > big bulky ones on the PSU) for about $3. > > It is quite likely that only the secondary circuit on the PSU needs to have > its electrolytic capacitors replaced. We're talking of anything between one > to half a dozen of capacitors. In all likelihood less than a $1 to $3. If > any are even slightly domed I'd start with those and spend no more than a few > cents. > > Primary circuit ceramic capacitors (transient protection) could have been > affected if the PSU was submitted to high surges in the mains supply. I had > one go bad on me after sheet lightning hit the area once. Its replacement > along with a resistor fixed the PSU without any further problems and to much > of my surprise - I thought it was a gonner! > > Domed capacitors on the MoBo is a different story. Quite likely other > components would have been affected and many of them are surface mounted. > You'll need a magnifying glass and steady hands for those. It is not > something I would attempt in haste, as it is easy to damage more components > than what you fix on a MoBo. YMMV. I don't think it's very likely to have damanged something else if it's just noise, but then again I'm not an electronics engineer, this is just a hobby of mine so you may be right. Though I can tell you that I have gotten a few damaged boards to work like new by just replacing the electrolitic caps. > PS. Noisy PSUs are nothing new. The noise is can be caused by the capacitors, > or the coils. Although annoying it does not necessarily mean that there is an > electrical problem with the components. If the fan is rattling, then a drop > of oil on its bearing should soon put a stop to this. As Dale mentioned, a > stalled fan will not help the longevity of the remaining components. :-) Agreed. -- Fernando Rodriguez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 20:24 ` Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-23 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 22:09 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-24 15:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2015-08-23 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 23/08/2015 22:24, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Sunday, August 23, 2015 12:14:58 PM Mick wrote: >> On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 01:11:03 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 3:19:50 PM Alan Grimes wrote: >>>> Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? >>>> >>>> The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off >>>> was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the >>>> chassis. >>>> >>>> You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The >>>> waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but >>>> sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- >>>> 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around >>>> 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This >>>> __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's >>>> regulators. >>> >>> Regulators don't filter noise, they introduce it. Capacitors do that as >>> somebody pointed on the other thread. >>> >>> So if you're on a tight budget and you have an electronics surplus store >>> nearby you can replace all the capacitors on your mobo and PSU (except the >>> big bulky ones on the PSU) for about $3. >> >> It is quite likely that only the secondary circuit on the PSU needs to have >> its electrolytic capacitors replaced. We're talking of anything between one >> to half a dozen of capacitors. In all likelihood less than a $1 to $3. If >> any are even slightly domed I'd start with those and spend no more than a > few >> cents. >> >> Primary circuit ceramic capacitors (transient protection) could have been >> affected if the PSU was submitted to high surges in the mains supply. I had >> one go bad on me after sheet lightning hit the area once. Its replacement >> along with a resistor fixed the PSU without any further problems and to much >> of my surprise - I thought it was a gonner! >> >> Domed capacitors on the MoBo is a different story. Quite likely other >> components would have been affected and many of them are surface mounted. >> You'll need a magnifying glass and steady hands for those. It is not >> something I would attempt in haste, as it is easy to damage more components >> than what you fix on a MoBo. YMMV. > > I don't think it's very likely to have damanged something else if it's just > noise, but then again I'm not an electronics engineer, this is just a hobby of > mine so you may be right. Though I can tell you that I have gotten a few > damaged boards to work like new by just replacing the electrolitic caps. That's quite normal - electrolytic caps are the only electronic components that can be considered to "wear out". Apart from batteries of course :-) Getting the caps off modern motherboards is a real PITA though - surface mount caps need semi-specialized equipment: a proper soldering iron or hot air pencil with a very fine tip, desolder braid, a magnifier and a very steady hand > >> PS. Noisy PSUs are nothing new. The noise is can be caused by the > capacitors, >> or the coils. Although annoying it does not necessarily mean that there is > an >> electrical problem with the components. If the fan is rattling, then a drop >> of oil on its bearing should soon put a stop to this. As Dale mentioned, a >> stalled fan will not help the longevity of the remaining components. :-) I recall an ancient TV from the mid '70s (Blaupunkt) that would sometimes develop a rattle in one of the drive circuit coils. Damn thing would sound like a hive of bees inside the cabinet! > > Agreed. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon @ 2015-08-23 22:09 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-24 15:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-23 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Sunday, August 23, 2015 10:34:20 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 23/08/2015 22:24, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > > On Sunday, August 23, 2015 12:14:58 PM Mick wrote: > >> On Sunday 23 Aug 2015 01:11:03 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > >>> On Saturday, August 22, 2015 3:19:50 PM Alan Grimes wrote: > >>>> Isn't this the filthiest oscilloscope u've seen recently? > >>>> > >>>> The only bare metal contact that I could safely use to get a reading off > >>>> was a +12v line on a spare PCI-E gpu plug. The ground reference is the > >>>> chassis. > >>>> > >>>> You can see the machine's settings in the photo clearly enough. The > >>>> waveform is fairly constant, it stays in this mode most of the time but > >>>> sometimes goes into a "low ripple" mode where the ripple falls to +/- > >>>> 20mv and holds tight. The scaling indicates the upward spikes are around > >>>> 0.120 volts and the downward spikes are about 0.22 volts. This > >>>> __SHOULD__ be within the input tolerances of the motherboard's > >>>> regulators. > >>> > >>> Regulators don't filter noise, they introduce it. Capacitors do that as > >>> somebody pointed on the other thread. > >>> > >>> So if you're on a tight budget and you have an electronics surplus store > >>> nearby you can replace all the capacitors on your mobo and PSU (except the > >>> big bulky ones on the PSU) for about $3. > >> > >> It is quite likely that only the secondary circuit on the PSU needs to have > >> its electrolytic capacitors replaced. We're talking of anything between one > >> to half a dozen of capacitors. In all likelihood less than a $1 to $3. If > >> any are even slightly domed I'd start with those and spend no more than a > > few > >> cents. > >> > >> Primary circuit ceramic capacitors (transient protection) could have been > >> affected if the PSU was submitted to high surges in the mains supply. I had > >> one go bad on me after sheet lightning hit the area once. Its replacement > >> along with a resistor fixed the PSU without any further problems and to much > >> of my surprise - I thought it was a gonner! > >> > >> Domed capacitors on the MoBo is a different story. Quite likely other > >> components would have been affected and many of them are surface mounted. > >> You'll need a magnifying glass and steady hands for those. It is not > >> something I would attempt in haste, as it is easy to damage more components > >> than what you fix on a MoBo. YMMV. > > > > I don't think it's very likely to have damanged something else if it's just > > noise, but then again I'm not an electronics engineer, this is just a hobby of > > mine so you may be right. Though I can tell you that I have gotten a few > > damaged boards to work like new by just replacing the electrolitic caps. > > That's quite normal - electrolytic caps are the only electronic > components that can be considered to "wear out". Apart from batteries of > course :-) > > Getting the caps off modern motherboards is a real PITA though - surface > mount caps need semi-specialized equipment: a proper soldering iron or > hot air pencil with a very fine tip, desolder braid, a magnifier and a > very steady hand For the tiny SMT ones I usually use an worn out iron tip (cause it may get plastic on it), heat the whole thing up and push it aside if there's room, then pull them off with twizzers and a little bit for force, clean up the contacts with braid. If they're many I use solder paste and an oven the get new ones on. But usually there's still a few through hole electrolytics (at least on boards old enough to be failing) and those are the ones that fail. When they're SMT it's usually a relatively big one or an SMT can and I only seen those fail on homemade or dev boards when I do something stupid. For the canned ones I heat the can up until it comes off. The real PITA with those is that you usually don't find those at a local store. > > > >> PS. Noisy PSUs are nothing new. The noise is can be caused by the > > capacitors, > >> or the coils. Although annoying it does not necessarily mean that there is > > an > >> electrical problem with the components. If the fan is rattling, then a drop > >> of oil on its bearing should soon put a stop to this. As Dale mentioned, a > >> stalled fan will not help the longevity of the remaining components. :-) > > I recall an ancient TV from the mid '70s (Blaupunkt) that would > sometimes develop a rattle in one of the drive circuit coils. Damn thing > would sound like a hive of bees inside the cabinet! -- Fernando Rodriguez ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-23 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 22:09 ` Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-24 15:57 ` Grant Edwards 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Grant Edwards @ 2015-08-24 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 2015-08-23, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote: > That's quite normal - electrolytic caps are the only electronic > components that can be considered to "wear out". Apart from batteries > of course :-) And various forms of non-volatile memory (EEPROM, NAND flash, etc.) that can withstand a limited number erase/program cycles. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm pretending that at we're all watching PHIL gmail.com SILVERS instead of RICARDO MONTALBAN! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-22 19:19 [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P Alan Grimes 2015-08-22 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 0:11 ` Fernando Rodriguez @ 2015-08-25 21:33 ` Neil Bothwick 2015-08-25 21:37 ` Alan McKinnon 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Neil Bothwick @ 2015-08-25 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --] On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:19:50 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > I had to use my windows 7 machine to get the photo off my camera because > digikam does not compile. =| What's wrong with putting the camera in mass storage mode, or putting it's memory card into your computer? Compiling DigiKam to copy one file brings new meaning to overkill. -- Neil Bothwick Geordi, show these children the antimatter - Picard [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P 2015-08-25 21:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick @ 2015-08-25 21:37 ` Alan McKinnon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Alan McKinnon @ 2015-08-25 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 25/08/2015 23:33, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:19:50 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote: > >> I had to use my windows 7 machine to get the photo off my camera because >> digikam does not compile. =| > > What's wrong with putting the camera in mass storage mode, or putting > it's memory card into your computer? > > Compiling DigiKam to copy one file brings new meaning to overkill. > > > I believe that honour goes to running wubi under wine on an Ubuntu guest VM in VBox/VMWare/KVM, running on an Ubuntu host. What do you get when you make it through that labyrinth? Why, it installs Ubuntu of course! -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-25 21:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-08-22 19:19 [gentoo-user] Filthy oscilloscope picture! =P Alan Grimes 2015-08-22 19:31 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 0:11 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-23 11:14 ` Mick 2015-08-23 11:46 ` Dale 2015-08-23 20:24 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-23 20:34 ` Alan McKinnon 2015-08-23 22:09 ` Fernando Rodriguez 2015-08-24 15:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards 2015-08-25 21:33 ` [gentoo-user] " Neil Bothwick 2015-08-25 21:37 ` Alan McKinnon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox