From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-165250-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0184C138D0D
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Jul 2015 12:02:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74C31E08C7;
	Thu,  9 Jul 2015 12:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 379EDE08B0
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Jul 2015 12:02:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbpo10 with SMTP id po10so73687119lbb.3
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=1M/rVJzEjEnhziE25zVUteKuAnh68NKc6oIverVSiIk=;
        b=xZIt9cywnDRLnR7FhTthet06AX16QDupw0KFczFOEKyo10FFDMuSfi4mqK1aGejM+c
         V1YAyLM+QSDSPAgR0f1DGGU+pJUBUAg5Q46fUQFAB8Yrj4Oo3jIYR13VMh48wTM87R7b
         cGabamgNu+IYxmkYCLsTkWZQe4FVQ/EvMhnmRSojMpLqKXEbbpmjTgw0eH9Hu6FRWXPX
         lhVjPV1CzKDwYOU1dpQCpqwsPE4UTxYTrg/hNUoYmkvqYVcHdAJqoANEm8sSfh2dUwaE
         A9599BaKVV5fSIl5GrAu7A89PbN2+D/DUohWzHT91fylFhJoyYciFAcp+v9OU0Zomb7Q
         7ZWQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.1.4 with SMTP id 4mr14497553lai.25.1436443340862;
        Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cosmo ([178.214.192.160])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jp6sm1373095lab.18.2015.07.09.05.02.19
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <559e62cc.a673980a.c356c.657e@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:01:25 +0300
From: Gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone else having a problem with bash?
In-Reply-To: <20150709124824.10f75958@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
References: <20150706100117.0d993a04@a6>
	<559E5D43.2070800@gmail.com>
	<20150709124824.10f75958@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 425a9c76-5e30-48cd-85b3-ce2131714b7d
X-Archives-Hash: ff48c6e69a8741d8a51de19712b88d37

On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:24 +0100 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:38:43 +0200, Stephan M=C3=BCller wrote:
>=20
> > As a wild guess into the blue, it could be related to readline. As I
> > see gentoo's bash uses the standalone readline from coreutils, while
> > the original bash source maintains an own trimmed version of readline..
> > just a thought
>=20
> In that case, re-emerging Bash with USE=3D"-readline" should get rid of t=
he
> problem.
>=20
> <smug>I can't test it myself as a use a superior shell to Bash</smug>

Which one? And why is it superior to bash?